Delay discounting predicts adolescent substance abuse treatment outcome.

Delay discounting predicts adolescent substance abuse treatment outcome.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037/a0026543
复制
发表时间:
2012-06
影响因子:
2.3
通讯作者:
Budney, Alan J.
Budney, Alan J.
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Stanger, Catherine;Ryan, Stacy R.;Fu, Hongyun;Landes, Reid D.;Jones, Bryan A.;Bickel, Warren K.;Budney, Alan J.

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

本研究的目的是确定接受大麻滥用或依赖治疗的青少年中延迟折扣的预测因素,并测试延迟折扣作为治疗结果的预测因素。这项研究的参与者是165名12至18岁(M =15.8; SD = 1.3)的青少年(88%为男性),他们参加了一项临床试验,比较了青少年大麻滥用或依赖的三种行为治疗。参与者在治疗开始时完成了100美元和1,000美元的假设金钱和大麻的延迟折扣任务。总体而言,较小幅度的奖励比较大幅度的奖励折扣更大。延迟折扣率同时与人口统计学变量(社会经济地位,种族)。在青少年大麻滥用者的治疗戒断结果中,超过所接受的治疗类型的影响,预测的1,000美元的延迟折扣。对未来折扣水平较高的青少年可能是在治疗开始时识别的一个重要亚组。更倾向于低估未来的青年可能需要不同的干预策略来解决他们的冲动(例如,目标执行功能或抑制控制)和/或不同的强化时间表以解决他们对立即奖励的偏好程度。
The purpose of the current study was to identify predictors of delay discounting among adolescents receiving treatment for marijuana abuse or dependence, and to test delay discounting as a predictor of treatment outcome. Participants for this study were 165 adolescents (88% male) between the ages of 12 and 18 (M =15.8; SD = 1.3) who enrolled in a clinical trial comparing three behavioral treatments for adolescent marijuana abuse or dependence. Participants completed a delay discounting task at treatment onset for $100 and $1,000 of hypothetical money and marijuana. Overall, smaller magnitude rewards were discounted more than larger magnitude rewards. Delay discounting rates were concurrently related to demographic variables (SES, race). Delay discounting of $1,000 of money predicted during treatment abstinence outcomes among adolescent marijuana abusers, over and above the effects of type of treatment received. Teens who show higher levels of discounting of the future may be an important subgroup to identify at treatment onset. Youth with a greater tendency to discount the future may require different intervention strategies that address their impulsivity (e.g., targeting executive function or inhibitory control) and/or different schedules of reinforcement to address their degree of preference for immediate rewards.
DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2002.77-129
发表时间: 2002-03-01
影响因子: 2.7
作者:
Johnson, MW;Bickel, WK
通讯作者: Bickel, WK
DOI: 10.1037/1064-1297.5.3.256
发表时间: 1997-08-01
影响因子: 2.3
作者:
Madden, GJ;Petry, NM;Bickel, WK
通讯作者: Bickel, WK
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.04.020
发表时间: 2009-10-01
影响因子: 4.2
作者:
MacKillop, James;Kahler, Christopher W.
通讯作者: Kahler, Christopher W.
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.067
发表时间: 2011-01-15
期刊: NEUROIMAGE
影响因子: 5.7
作者:
Christakou, Anastasia;Brammer, Mick;Rubia, Katya
通讯作者: Rubia, Katya
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.09.005
发表时间: 2006-07-01
影响因子: 4.4
作者:
Heil, Sarah H.;Johnson, Matthew W.;Bickel, Warren K.
通讯作者: Bickel, Warren K.