Personality traits and physical functioning: a cross-sectional multimethod facet-level analysis.
Personality traits and physical functioning: a cross-sectional multimethod facet-level analysis.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1186/s11556-020-00251-9
复制
发表时间：
2020-11-24
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Kokko K
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kekäläinen T;Terracciano A;Sipilä S;Kokko K
本研究旨在探讨人格特质及其方面是否与身体活动和步行表现的多方法评估有关，以及它们是否解释了自我报告和加速度计评估的身体活动之间的差异。参与者是来自芬兰的社区居民，70 - 85岁的男性和女性（n = 239），他们是临床试验的一部分。人格特征及其方面使用240项NEO人格量表-3进行测量。通过运动频率、强度和持续时间（自我报告的代谢当量分钟（MET））和三轴加速度计（轻、中、剧烈的身体活动和总MET分钟）来评估身体活动。采用6 min步行距离和10 m步行速度测量步行表现。线性回归分析控制了年龄、性别、教育程度、体重指数、疾病负担和干预组。外向性的活动方面与自我报告的met分钟、加速度计评估的轻度体力活动和步行表现呈正相关。外向性的积极情绪方面与自我报告的met分钟和步行表现呈正相关。开放性及其侧面和外向性寻求刺激的侧面与行走表现呈正相关。责任心及其大部分方面都与身体活动和步行表现有关，但在考虑了所有控制变量后，这些关联在统计上并不显著。神经质的冲动方面与加速度计评估的轻度体力活动和步行表现呈负相关，但在考虑了所有控制变量后，与步行表现的关联减弱。加速度计评估的中度到剧烈的身体活动与人格特征或方面无关。差异分析表明，开放性和外向性中寻求刺激的方面与更高的自我报告相关，而不是加速度计评估的身体活动。在所有方法中，在外向性和尽责性方面得分较高的老年人往往更活跃，在步行方面的表现优于同龄人。在开放性和外向性寻求刺激方面得分较高的老年人走路表现更好，但与加速度计相比，他们高估了自己报告的身体活动。在线版本包含补充材料，可在10.1186/s11556-020-00251-9获得。
This study aimed to investigate whether personality traits and their facets are associated with a multi-methods assessment of physical activity and walking performance and whether they explain the discrepancy between self-reported and accelerometer-assessed physical activity. The participants were community-dwelling, 70–85-year-old men and women from Finland (n = 239) who were part of a clinical trial. Personality traits and their facets were measured using the 240-item NEO Personality Inventory-3. Physical activity was assessed using questions about frequency, intensity and duration of exercise (self-reported metabolic equivalent minutes (MET)) and by tri-axial accelerometers (light and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and total MET-minutes). Walking performance was measured by 6-min walking distance and 10-m walking speed. Linear regression analyses were controlled for age, sex, education, body mass index, disease burden, and intervention group. The activity facet of extraversion was positively associated with self-reported MET-minutes, accelerometer-assessed light physical activity and walking performance. The positive emotions facet of extraversion was positively associated with self-reported MET-minutes and walking performance. Openness and its facets and the excitement seeking facet of extraversion were positively associated with walking performance. Conscientiousness and most of its facets were associated with both physical activity and walking performance, but these associations were not statistically significant after accounting for all control variables. The impulsiveness facet of neuroticism was negatively associated with accelerometer-assessed light physical activity and walking performance, but the associations with walking performance attenuated after accounting for all control variables. Accelerometer-assessed moderate-to-vigorous physical activity was not associated with personality traits or facets. Discrepancy analyses suggest that openness and the excitement-seeking facet of extraversion were associated with higher self-reported than accelerometer-assessed physical activity. Consistently across methods, older adults who scored higher on facets of extraversion and conscientiousness tended to be more active and outperformed peers on walking performance. Older adults who scored higher in the facets of openness and the excitement-seeking facet of extraversion had better walking performance but also overestimated their self-reported physical activity compared to the accelerometers. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s11556-020-00251-9.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Artese A;Ehley D;Sutin AR;Terracciano A
通讯作者：
Terracciano A
影响因子：
4.1
作者：
Cerin E;Cain KL;Oyeyemi AL;Owen N;Conway TL;Cochrane T;VAN Dyck D;Schipperijn J;Mitáš J;Toftager M;Aguinaga-Ontoso I;Sallis JF
通讯作者：
Sallis JF
DOI：
10.1186/1479-5868-9-148
发表时间：
2012-12-18
期刊：
The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity
影响因子：
--
作者：
Kowalski K;Rhodes R;Naylor PJ;Tuokko H;MacDonald S
通讯作者：
MacDonald S
影响因子：
2.3
作者：
Graham, Eileen K.;Bastarache, Emily D.;Mroczek, Daniel K.
通讯作者：
Mroczek, Daniel K.
影响因子：
4.1
作者：
Cukic, Iva;Gale, Catharine R.;Wyke, Sally
通讯作者：
Wyke, Sally