The study of authoritarian diffusion and cooperation: comparative lessons on interests versus ideology, nowadays and in history
The study of authoritarian diffusion and cooperation: comparative lessons on interests versus ideology, nowadays and in history
复制标题
威权扩散与合作研究：当今和历史上利益与意识形态的比较教训
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
A. Bank
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Bank
摘要本文概述并讨论了权威传播与合作研究中利益与意识形态作用的主要比较结果。它强调了20世纪末和21世纪初务实利益的首要地位，这一结论在中东欧、中东和撒哈拉以南非洲的不同情况下都适用。特别重要的是，负面的调查结果反映了意识形态诉求的缺失。与此同时，基于利益的账户的首要地位需要加以限定，无论是在今天（拉丁美洲的玻利瓦尔主义），还是从更长远的历史角度来看。正如法西斯主义和共产主义的经验所表明的那样，曾经有过具有传教士意识形态的独裁政权，在许多国家激发了效仿。在此背景下，本文主张“回到”历史，以更好地解释专制扩散与合作的背景约束性质。它还呼吁从抽象的阶梯上“下移”，研究威权传播与合作展开的更具体的机制。
ABSTRACT This article outlines and discusses the central comparative findings on the role of interest versus ideology in the study of authoritarian diffusion and cooperation. It highlights the primacy of pragmatic interests in the late twentieth and early twenty-first century, a finding that holds in diverse cases in Eastern Central Europe, the Middle East and Sub-Saharan Africa. Of particular importance here are negative findings that reflect the absence of ideological appeal. At the same time, the primacy of interest-based accounts needs to be qualified, both today (Bolivarianism in Latin America) and especially considering a longer historical perspective. As the experiences of fascism and communism suggest, there used to be autocracies with missionary ideologies that inspired emulation in a wide range of countries. Against this background, the article advocates a “moving back” to history to better account for the context-bound nature of authoritarian diffusion and cooperation. It also calls for a “moving down” the ladder of abstraction to study the more concrete mechanisms in which authoritarian diffusion and cooperation unfold.
影响因子：
3.2
作者：
M. Kneuer;T. Demmelhuber
通讯作者：
T. Demmelhuber
威权团结的局限性：阿拉伯之春期间海湾君主国和维护威权统治
影响因子：
5.3
作者：
Odinius
通讯作者：
Odinius