NCI's publication affiliation conundrum: Reframing innovation to incentivize an equitable path for advocate representation.
NCI's publication affiliation conundrum: Reframing innovation to incentivize an equitable path for advocate representation.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.tranon.2021.101325
复制
发表时间：
2022-03
影响因子：
5
通讯作者：
LaBarge MA
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Samson S;Northey JJ;Acerbi I;Goga A;Flink CL;Weaver VM;LaBarge MA
Advocacy engagement has been at the forefront of National Cancer Institute (NCI) efforts to advance scientific discoveries and transform medical interventions. Nonetheless, the journey for advocates has been uneven. Case in Point: NCI publication affiliation rules of engagement pose unique equity challenges while raising questions about structural representation in biomedical research. Abiding by the core rationale that publication affiliation should be tailored to employment status, the NCI has systematically denied research advocate volunteers the opportunity to specifically list NCI as an institutional affiliation on academic publications. Unpacking advocate NCI publication affiliation restrictions and its links with advocacy heritage preservation and convergent science goals poses unique diversity, equity, and inclusion challenges and opportunities. Improving the quality of structural representation in biomedical research requires new theories of action and flexible planning to advance, promote and build capacity for strategic advocacy inclusion and equity within publication affiliation initiatives. Here we highlight several opportunities for how leadership might formulate a radically different vision for NCI's approach. This perspective interrogates the best way forward for ensuring that biomedical employee and volunteer advocate workforce publication affiliation intersections are characterized by increased creativity and representation parity. Imbuing the scientist and clinical researcher archetype with social dimensions, we join NCI critical thinkers in urging employees, funded academics, and volunteer citizen scientists to collectively assume the role as paladins of science and integrity who view the triumphs of making a difference in science alongside the social responsibility of promoting transdisciplinary professionalism and the democratization of science.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
0.5
作者：
Barabino, Gilda A.
通讯作者：
Barabino, Gilda A.
影响因子：
11.2
作者：
Perlmutter, Jane;Bell, Shannon K.;Darien, Gwen
通讯作者：
Darien, Gwen
影响因子：
3.2
作者：
Boudes, Mathieu;Robinson, Paul;Sargeant, Ify
通讯作者：
Sargeant, Ify
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Ginther DK;Basner J;Jensen U;Schnell J;Kington R;Schaffer WT
通讯作者：
Schaffer WT
影响因子：
1.5
作者：
Boutin, Marc;Dewulf, Lode;Sargeant, Ify
通讯作者：
Sargeant, Ify