Is great information good enough? Evidence from physicians as patients.
Is great information good enough? Evidence from physicians as patients.
复制标题
伟大的信息就足够好吗？来自医生和患者的证据。
DOI：
10.1016/j.jhealeco.2020.102406
复制
发表时间：
2021-01
影响因子：
3.5
通讯作者：
Jena A
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Frakes M;Gruber J;Jena A
我们对旨在改善患者信息缺陷的政策可能导致更多地遵守临床指南和推荐做法的程度设定了上限。为此，我们比较了一组应该对医疗实践有最好可能的信息的患者--即医生作为患者--所达到的依从性程度与一组可比的非内科患者所达到的程度，并采取了不同的步骤来考虑两组之间无法观察到的差异。我们的结果表明，医生在遵守低价值和高价值护理指南方面充其量只比非医生稍微好一点。
We place an upper bound on the degree to which policies aimed at improving the information deficiencies of patients may lead to greater adherence to clinical guidelines and recommended practices. To do so, we compare the degree of adherence attained by a group of patients that should have the best possible information on health care practices—i.e., physicians as patients—with that attained by a comparable group of non-physician patients, taking various steps to account for unobservable differences between the two groups. Our results suggest that physicians, at best, do only slightly better in adhering to both low- and high-value care guidelines than non-physicians.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
7.2
作者：
DEYO, RA;CHERKIN, DC;CIOL, MA
通讯作者：
CIOL, MA
影响因子：
5.3
作者：
Frakes, Michael;Gruber, Jonathan
通讯作者：
Gruber, Jonathan
影响因子：
5.3
作者：
Johnson, Erin M.;Rehavi, M. Marit
通讯作者：
Rehavi, M. Marit
影响因子：
120.7
作者：
Schneider, EC;Epstein, AM
通讯作者：
Epstein, AM
影响因子：
10.7
作者：
Cutler, DA;Huckman, RS;Landrum, MB
通讯作者：
Landrum, MB