Dual-trajectories of opioid and gabapentinoid use and risk of subsequent drug overdose among Medicare beneficiaries in the United States: a retrospective cohort study.

Dual-trajectories of opioid and gabapentinoid use and risk of subsequent drug overdose among Medicare beneficiaries in the United States: a retrospective cohort study.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1111/add.15189
复制
发表时间:
2021-04
期刊:
Addiction (Abingdon, England)
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Lo-Ciganic WH
Lo-Ciganic WH
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Zhou L;Bhattacharjee S;Kwoh CK;Tighe PJ;Reisfield GM;Malone DC;Slack M;Wilson DL;Chang CY;Lo-Ciganic WH

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

关于阿片类药物和加巴喷丁类药物(OPI-GABA)的使用时间和剂量模式与不良结局风险的关系知之甚少。我们研究了OPI-GABA剂量和持续时间轨迹与随后的药物过量之间的关联。回顾性队列研究。美国医疗保险。使用5%的样本(2011-2016年),我们确定了71,005名患有纤维肌痛、腰痛、神经病变和/或骨关节炎的医疗保险受益人(平均年龄±SD=65.5±14.5岁,女性= 68.1%,白色=76.8%)。基于组的多轨迹模型根据每周平均标准化日剂量(即,OPIs=吗啡毫克当量,加巴斯=最低有效日剂量)。我们估计了具有3到12个轨迹的模型,并根据贝叶斯信息准则(BIC)和Nagin准则选择了最佳模型。我们估计了指数年后12个月内首次药物过量诊断的时间风险,使用治疗加权多变量考克斯比例风险模型的逆概率调整了社会人口统计学和健康因素。我们确定了10个不同的轨迹(BIC=-1,176,954;仅OPI =3,仅GABA =3,OPI-GABA=4)。与仅使用OPI的早期停药者相比(队列的40.6%),1年药物过量风险因轨迹组而异:一致的仅低剂量OPI使用者(16.6%; HR=1.47,95%CI=1.19-1.82),持续高剂量OPI仅使用者(1.8%; HR=4.57,95%CI=2.99-6.98),仅GABA早期停药者(12.5%; HR=1.39,95%CI=1.09-1.77),持续仅使用低剂量GABA(11.0%; HR=1.44,95%CI=1.12-1.85),持续高剂量仅GABA使用者(3.1%; HR=1.43,95%CI=0.94-2.17),提前停用OPI和持续使用低剂量GABA(6.9%; HR=1.24,95%CI=0.90-1.69),持续低剂量OPI-GABA使用者(3.4%; HR=2.49,95%CI=1.76-3.52),持续低剂量OPI和高剂量GABA使用者(3.2%; HR=2.46,95%CI=1.71-3.53),以及一致的高剂量OPI和中等剂量GABA使用者(0.9%; HR=7.22,95%CI=4.46-11.69)。药物过量的风险在美国医疗保险受益人之间存在很大差异,阿片类药物和加巴喷丁类药物的使用轨迹不同。仅使用高剂量阿片类药物的使用者和所有持续的阿片类药物和加巴喷丁类药物使用者(无论剂量如何)与仅使用阿片类药物的早期停药者相比,随后药物过量的风险增加了一倍以上。
Little is known about opioid and gabapentinoid (OPI-GABA) use duration and dose patterns’ associations with adverse outcomes risks. We examined associations between OPI-GABA dose and duration trajectories and subsequent drug overdose. Retrospective cohort study. US Medicare. Using a 5% sample (2011–2016), we identified 71,005 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with fibromyalgia, low back pain, neuropathy, and/or osteoarthritis initiating OPIs and/or GABAs (mean age±SD=65.5±14.5 years, female=68.1%, white=76.8%). Group-based multi-trajectory models identified distinct OPI-GABA use patterns during the year of OPI and/or GABA initiation, based on weekly average standardized daily dose (i.e., OPIs=morphine milligram equivalent, GABAs=minimum effective daily dose). We estimated models with three to 12 trajectories and selected the best model based on Bayesian information criterion (BIC) and Nagin’s criteria. We estimated risk of time to first drug overdose diagnosis within 12 months following the index year, adjusting for socio-demographic and health factors using inverse probability of treatment weighted multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. We identified 10 distinct trajectories (BIC=−1,176,954; OPI-only=3, GABA-only=3, OPI-GABA=4). Compared with OPI-only early discontinuers (40.6% of the cohort), 1-year drug overdose risk varied by trajectory group: consistent low-dose OPI-only users (16.6%; HR=1.47, 95%CI=1.19–1.82), consistent high-dose OPI-only users (1.8%; HR=4.57, 95%CI=2.99–6.98), GABA-only early discontinuers (12.5%; HR=1.39, 95%CI=1.09–1.77), consistent low-dose GABA-only users (11.0%; HR=1.44, 95%CI=1.12–1.85), consistent high-dose GABA-only users (3.1%; HR=1.43, 95%CI=0.94–2.17), early discontinuation of OPIs and consistent low-dose GABA users (6.9%; HR=1.24, 95%CI=0.90–1.69), consistent low-dose OPI-GABA users (3.4%; HR=2.49, 95%CI=1.76–3.52), consistent low-dose OPI and high-dose GABA users (3.2%; HR=2.46, 95%CI=1.71–3.53), and consistent high-dose OPI and moderate-dose GABA users (0.9%; HR=7.22, 95%CI=4.46–11.69). Risk of drug overdose varied substantially among US Medicare beneficiaries on different use trajectories of opioids and gabapentinoids. High-dose opioid-only users and all consistent opioid and gabapentinoid users (regardless of doses) had more than double the risk of subsequent drug overdose compared with opioid-only early discontinuers.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.10.008
发表时间: 2009-02
期刊: The journal of pain
影响因子: --
作者:
Chou R;Fanciullo GJ;Fine PG;Adler JA;Ballantyne JC;Davies P;Donovan MI;Fishbain DA;Foley KM;Fudin J;Gilson AM;Kelter A;Mauskop A;O'Connor PG;Passik SD;Pasternak GW;Portenoy RK;Rich BA;Roberts RG;Todd KH;Miaskowski C;American Pain Society-American Academy of Pain Medicine Opioids Guidelines Panel
通讯作者: American Pain Society-American Academy of Pain Medicine Opioids Guidelines Panel
DOI: 10.1186/s13075-015-0530-8
发表时间: 2015-01-28
影响因子: 4.9
作者:
Kim, Seoyoung C.;Landon, Joan E.;Lee, Yvonne C.
通讯作者: Lee, Yvonne C.
DOI: 10.12965/jer.1836420.210
发表时间: 2018-12-01
影响因子: 1.9
作者:
Hesami, Omid;Haghighatzadeh, Mahsa;Salehi, Shahin
通讯作者: Salehi, Shahin
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.01.013
发表时间: 2017-05-01
影响因子: 4.2
作者:
Abrahamsson, Tove;Berge, Jonas;Hakansson, Anders
通讯作者: Hakansson, Anders
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-2-201001190-00006
发表时间: 2010-01-19
影响因子: 39.2
作者:
Dunn, Kate M.;Saunders, Kathleen W.;Von Korff, Michael
通讯作者: Von Korff, Michael