E-Mentoring to Address Youth Health: A Systematic Review.

E-Mentoring to Address Youth Health: A Systematic Review.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1007/s40894-021-00172-3
复制
发表时间:
2022
影响因子:
4.7
通讯作者:
DuBois DL
DuBois DL
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kaufman MR;Levine D;Casella A;DuBois DL

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

电子师徒(e-mentoring)是将数字技术整合到师徒关系中的一种方式,最近越来越受欢迎;然而,迄今为止,电子指导在解决青年健康问题方面的有效性尚未得到综合评价。本研究通过系统回顾和证据质量评估,综合了有关电子辅导对青少年(10-24岁)健康和福祉影响的文献。总共确定了833份记录,其中14份符合资格标准(自1995年以来以英文出版,针对青年健康和/或有健康问题的青年,通信完全数字化或与面对面互动相结合)。结果表明,大多数以健康为重点的电子指导研究都是针对有现有健康状况的年轻人进行的,而不是利用电子指导促进整体健康和福祉。所包括的项目主要侧重于为可能受到面对面模式挑战的青年亚群体提供指导。对纳入研究的质量评估表明,证据的强度一般。研究结果表明,电子指导有可能接触到具有独特健康问题的青年,并在青年向成年过渡时促进对健康状况的独立管理;然而,需要对更大样本量的电子指导项目进行更严格的评估。在线版本包含补充材料,可在10.1007/s40894-021-00172-3获得。
Electronic mentoring (e-mentoring), the integration of digital technology in mentoring relationships, has recently grown in popularity; however, the effectiveness of e-mentoring in addressing youth health has not been synthesized to date. The current study synthesizes the literature on e-mentoring to affect the health and well-being of youth (10–24 years) through a systematic review and evidence quality assessment. A total of 833 records were identified, of which 14 met eligibility criteria (published in English since 1995, targeted youth health and/or youth with health issues, and communication was entirely digital or combined with in-person interaction). The results showed that the majority of health-focused e-mentoring studies were conducted with young people with existing health conditions rather than on the use of e-mentoring to promote overall health and wellness. The included programs focused largely on bringing mentoring to youth subpopulations that may be challenged by in-person models. Quality assessments of the included studies showed that the strength of the evidence is mediocre. The findings suggest that e-mentoring has the potential to reach youth with unique health concerns and to promote independent management of health conditions as youth transition to adulthood; however, more rigorous evaluation of e-mentoring programs with larger sample sizes is needed. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40894-021-00172-3.
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b2535
发表时间: 2009-07-21
期刊: BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
影响因子: --
作者:
Moher D;Liberati A;Tetzlaff J;Altman DG;PRISMA Group
通讯作者: PRISMA Group
DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx169
发表时间: 2018-04-01
影响因子: 8
作者:
Heida, Anke;Dijkstra, Alie;van Rheenen, Patrick F.
通讯作者: van Rheenen, Patrick F.
DOI: 10.1016/s0001-8791(03)00044-7
发表时间: 2003-10-01
影响因子: 11.1
作者:
Ensher, EA;Heun, C;Blanchard, A
通讯作者: Blanchard, A
DOI: 10.1177/0741932510362203
发表时间: 2011-07-01
影响因子: 2.4
作者:
Grant, David G.;Dieker, Lisa A.
通讯作者: Dieker, Lisa A.
DOI: 10.1016/j.pedn.2010.07.007
发表时间: 2012-02-01
影响因子: 2.4
作者:
Letourneau, Nicole;Stewart, Miriam;Watt, Susan
通讯作者: Watt, Susan