Long-term effectiveness of epidural steroid injections after new episodes of low back pain in older adults.
Long-term effectiveness of epidural steroid injections after new episodes of low back pain in older adults.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1002/ejp.1975
复制
发表时间：
2022-08
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Jarvik, Jeffrey G
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Curatolo, Michele;Rundell, Sean D;Gold, Laura S;Suri, P;Friedly, Janna L;Nedeljkovic, Sdrj S;Deyo, Richard A;Turner, Judith A;Bresnahan, Brian W;Avins, Andrew L;Kessler, Larry;Heagerty, Patrick J;Jarvik, Jeffrey G
There is limited research on the long-term effectiveness of epidural steroid injections (ESI) in older adults despite the high prevalence of back and leg pain in this age group. We tested the hypotheses that older adults undergoing ESI, compared to patients not receiving ESI: 1) have worse pain, disability and quality of life (“outcomes”) pre-ESI, 2) have improved outcomes after ESI, and 3) have improved outcomes due to a specific ESI effect. We prospectively studied patients ≥65 years old presenting to primary care with new episodes of back pain in three US healthcare systems (BOLD registry). Outcomes were leg and back pain intensity, disability and quality of life, assessed at baseline and 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-month follow-ups. We categorized participants as: 1) ESI within 6 months from the index visit (n=295); 2) no ESI within 6 months (n=4,809); 3) no ESI within 6 months, propensity-score matched to group 1 (n=483). We analyzed the data using linear regression and Generalized Estimating Equations. Pain intensity, disability and quality of life at baseline were significantly worse at baseline in ESI patients (group 1) than in group 2. The improvement from baseline to 24 months in all outcomes was statistically significant for group 1. However, no statistically significant differences were observed between outcome trajectories for the propensity-score matched groups 1 and 3. Older adults treated with ESI have long-term improvement. However, the improvement is unlikely the result of a specific ESI effect.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1097/ajp.0000000000000943
发表时间：
2021-07-01
期刊：
The Clinical journal of pain
影响因子：
--
作者：
de Bruijn TM;de Groot IB;Miedema HS;Haumann J;Ostelo RWJG
通讯作者：
Ostelo RWJG
影响因子：
5.1
作者：
Eworuke, Efe;Crisafi, Leah;Graham, David J.
通讯作者：
Graham, David J.
影响因子：
5.7
作者：
Ghai, Babita;Vadaje, Kaivalya Sadashiv;Dhillon, Mandeep Singh
通讯作者：
Dhillon, Mandeep Singh
影响因子：
3
作者：
Oliveira, Crystian B.;Maher, Christopher G.;Pinto, Rafael Z.
通讯作者：
Pinto, Rafael Z.
减少观察研究中混杂影响的倾向评分方法简介。
影响因子：
3.8
作者：
Austin PC
通讯作者：
Austin PC