The evaluation of a participatory extension programme focused on climate friendly farming

The evaluation of a participatory extension programme focused on climate friendly farming
复制标题

对以气候友好型农业为重点的参与性推广计划的评估

DOI:
10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.03.010
复制
发表时间:
2020
影响因子:
5.1
通讯作者:
Knook J
Knook J
中科院分区:
法学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Knook J

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

农业是全球温室气体排放的主要来源,因此需要采取有效的政策干预措施,以减少这些排放。农业部门采用的一种干预形式是参与性推广方案。PEP是基于自愿参与的咨询方案,农民、研究人员和农村专家通过分享信息和经验集体学习。为了评估这些计划对气候友好型农业的贡献,本文对PEP进行了一次事后评估,重点是英国农场减排实践的自愿吸收。我们使用混合方法来理解新实践的采用和一系列人类社会成果,如社会学习,弹性和改善决策。我们发现,在PEP的参与者表现出更高水平的实践采用相比,非参与者。然而,对人类社会指标的评价表明,这种变化并不总是归因于PEP的参与。本文通过对发达国家气候变化PEP进行第一次评估,并通过制定和应用气候变化PEP的有效评估框架,为当前文献做出了贡献,以便了解PEP所实现的变化。
Agriculture is a major source of global greenhouse gas emissions and therefore effective policy interventions are required in order to mitigate these emissions. One form of intervention used within the agricultural sector is participatory extension programmes (PEPs). PEPs are advisory programmes based on voluntary participation where farmers, researchers, and rural experts collectively learn by sharing information and experiences. To evaluate the contribution of these programmes towards more climate friendly farming, this paper conducts anex-postevaluation of a PEP focused on the voluntary uptake of on-farm emissions mitigation practices in the UK. We use a mixed-methods approach to understand both the adoption of new practices and a range of human-social outcomes such as social learning, resilience and improved decision-making. We find that participants in the PEP show a higher level of practice adoption compared to non-participants. However, the evaluation of the human-social indicators shows that the change cannot always be attributed to PEP participation. The paper contributes to the current literature by conducting the first evaluation on a climate change PEP in a developed country and by developing and applying an effective evaluation framework for climate change PEPs, in order to achieve an understanding of the change achieved by PEPs.
DOI: --
发表时间: 2012
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
A. Cristóvão;A. Koutsouris;M. Kugler
通讯作者: M. Kugler
发展农民主导的可持续推广小组:孟加拉国案例研究的经验教训
DOI: --
发表时间: 2011
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Md. Mofakkarul Islam;D. Gray;J. Reid;P. Kemp
通讯作者: P. Kemp
论科学客观性
DOI: --
发表时间: 1968
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
E. Castle
通讯作者: E. Castle
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2004.00270.x
发表时间: 2004-04-01
期刊: SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS
影响因子: 4.1
作者:
Burton, RJF
通讯作者: Burton, RJF
DOI: --
发表时间: 2013
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
D. Läpple;T. Hennessy;C. Newman
通讯作者: C. Newman