Methods and measures to evaluate the impact of participatory model building on public policymakers: a scoping review protocol.
Methods and measures to evaluate the impact of participatory model building on public policymakers: a scoping review protocol.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074891
复制
发表时间：
2024-01-06
期刊：
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
Langellier, Brent A.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Henson, Rosie Mae;Purtle, Jonathan;Headen, Irene;Stankov, Ivana;Langellier, Brent A.
关键词：
公共政策制定者越来越多地参与到参与式模型构建过程中，例如小组模型构建。了解决策者参与这些过程对决策者的影响是很重要的，因为他们的决定往往对影响健康的复杂系统的动态产生重大影响。对于参与式模式建设对公共决策者的影响进行了多大程度的评估，以及用于评估这些影响的方法和措施，人们知之甚少。制定了一项范围审查协议，其目标是：(1)范围界定研究，评估促进参与式模式构建过程对参与这些过程的公共决策者的影响；(2)描述了影响评价的方法和措施以及评价的主要发现。乔安娜布里格斯研究所的人口，概念，语境框架被用来制定文章识别过程。检索medline （Ovid）、ProQuest Health and Medical、Scopus、Web of Science、Embase （Ovid）、CINAHL Complete和psycinfo等7个电子数据库。确定的文章将根据纳入和排除标准进行筛选，并使用和报告范围审查的首选系统评价报告项目和范围审查的元分析扩展清单。数据提取工具将收集三个领域的信息：研究特征、方法和测量以及发现。审查将使用系统审查数据管理平台covid - ence进行。所进行的范围审查将概述如何评估公共决策者参与参与式模式建立过程的情况。研究结果将通过同行评议的出版物传播，并传播给召集决策者参与模式建设进程的实践社区。这项审查不需要伦理批准，因为它不是人类受试者研究。
Public policymakers are increasingly engaged in participatory model building processes, such as group model building. Understanding the impacts of policymaker participation in these processes on policymakers is important given that their decisions often have significant influence on the dynamics of complex systems that affect health. Little is known about the extent to which the impacts of participatory model building on public policymakers have been evaluated or the methods and measures used to evaluate these impacts. A scoping review protocol was developed with the objectives of: (1) scoping studies that have evaluated the impacts of facilitated participatory model building processes on public policymakers who participated in these processes; and (2) describing methods and measures used to evaluate impacts and the main findings of these evaluations. The Joanna Briggs Institute’s Population, Concept, Context framework was used to formulate the article identification process. Seven electronic databases—MEDLINE (Ovid), ProQuest Health and Medical, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase (Ovid), CINAHL Complete and PsycInfo—will be searched. Identified articles will be screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist for scoping reviews will be used and reported. A data extraction tool will collect information across three domains: study characteristics, methods and measures, and findings. The review will be conducted using Covidence, a systematic review data management platform. The scoping review produced will generate an overview of how public policymaker engagement in participatory model building processes has been evaluated. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and to communities of practice that convene policymakers in participatory model building processes. This review will not require ethics approval because it is not human subject research.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.2
作者：
Kwamie A;Ha S;Ghaffar A
通讯作者：
Ghaffar A
影响因子：
5.2
作者：
Felmingham, Tiana;Backholer, Kathryn;Hoban, Elizabeth;Brown, Andrew D. D.;Nagorcka-Smith, Phoebe;Allender, Steven
通讯作者：
Allender, Steven
有效传播研究对美国决策者的策略：系统评价。
DOI：
10.1186/s13012-020-01046-3
发表时间：
2020-10-15
期刊：
Implementation science : IS
影响因子：
--
作者：
Ashcraft LE;Quinn DA;Brownson RC
通讯作者：
Brownson RC
DOI：
10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6979
发表时间：
2022-12-06
影响因子：
3.5
作者：
Jumbam, Desmond T.;Kanmounye, Ulrick Sidney;Citron, Isabelle;Kamalo, Patrick
通讯作者：
Kamalo, Patrick
DOI：
10.34172/ijhpm.2021.28
发表时间：
2022-07-01
影响因子：
3.5
作者：
Mac-Seing M;Ochola E;Ogwang M;Zinszer K;Zarowsky C
通讯作者：
Zarowsky C