COVID-19 pandemic perspectives: A scientific silver lining?

COVID-19 pandemic perspectives: A scientific silver lining?
复制标题

COVID-19-19大流行视角:科学的银色局线?

DOI:
10.1002/rth2.12432
复制
发表时间:
2020-10
影响因子:
4.6
通讯作者:
Wolberg AS
Wolberg AS
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Dobson DA;Wolberg AS

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

关于COVID-19造成的众多负面影响的报道很普遍,但很少有人认为这一大规模社会转变会产生任何积极影响。该论坛探讨了在混乱的大流行病中科学界发生的潜在积极变化。这些积极因素包括虚拟超级团体和跨学科智囊团的形成。COVID-19迫使科学家离开实验室,为更多关于科学和实验设计的对话创造了时间和空间。在这个社会动荡的时期远离实验室也给了科学家们时间来直接解决制度性种族主义及其对科学多样性的压制。尽管COVID-19是一场无法预见的史诗般的灾难,但在疫情结束后,我们科学界的一些变化应该仍然存在。通过这些小小的成功,我们无疑将使我们的实验室变得更强大、更智能、更高效。
Accounts of the numerous negative effects caused by COVID‐19 are pervasive, but few perspectives have identified any positive impacts of this massive societal shift. This forum examines potentially positive changes that have occurred within the scientific community amid the chaotic pandemic. Among these positives are the formation of virtual supergroups and an interdisciplinary brain trust. In forcing scientists away from their lab benches, COVID‐19 has created time and space for more conversations about science and experimental design. Being away from the lab in this time of social unrest has also given scientists time to directly address institutional racism and its suppression of diversity in science. Although COVID‐19 has been an unforeseen disaster of epic proportions, some of the resulting changes in our scientific community should remain in place after the pandemic is over. By leveraging these small wins, we will undoubtedly return to our laboratories stronger, smarter, and more efficient.
DOI: 10.1002/rth2.12376
发表时间: 2020-06-30
影响因子: 4.6
作者:
Longchamp, Alban;Longchamp, Justine;Delaloye, Julie
通讯作者: Delaloye, Julie
DOI: 10.1038/s41558-020-0797-x
发表时间: 2020-05-19
影响因子: 30.7
作者:
Le Quere, Corinne;Jackson, Robert B.;Peters, Glen P.
通讯作者: Peters, Glen P.
DOI: 10.1002/rth2.12394
发表时间: 2020-06-28
影响因子: 4.6
作者:
Taylor, Kirk A.;Machlus, Kellie R.
通讯作者: Machlus, Kellie R.