Adalimumab and Infliximab Impair SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Responses: Results from a Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Study in 11 422 Biologic-Treated Patients.

Adalimumab and Infliximab Impair SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Responses: Results from a Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Study in 11 422 Biologic-Treated Patients.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab153
复制
发表时间:
2022-03-14
期刊:
Journal of Crohn's & colitis
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Ahmad T
Ahmad T
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Chanchlani N;Lin S;Chee D;Hamilton B;Nice R;Arkir Z;Bewshea C;Cipriano B;Derikx LAAP;Dunlop A;Greathead L;Griffiths RL;Ibraheim H;Kelleher P;Kok KB;Lees CW;MacDonald J;Sebastian S;Smith PJ;McDonald TJ;Irving PM;Powell N;Kennedy NA;Goodhand JR;Ahmad T

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

英夫利西单抗减弱SARS-CoV-2感染的血清学应答这是否是类效应,或者抗肿瘤坏死因子[抗TNF]水平是否影响血清学应答,仍不清楚。在2020年1月29日至9月30日期间储存在六个治疗药物监测实验室的11422名(53.3% [6084]男性;中位年龄36.8岁)免疫介导的炎症性疾病患者的剩余血清中测量了血清阳性率和SARS-CoV-2核衣壳抗体反应的幅度。数据与截至2021年7月11日的全国SARS-CoV-2 PCR结果相关联。PCR证实的SARS-CoV-2感染率在治疗组之间相似。英夫利西单抗和阿达木单抗治疗患者的血清阳性率低于Vedolizumab治疗患者(英夫利西单抗:3.0% [178/5893],阿达木单抗:3.0% [152/5074],Vedolizumab:6.7% [25/375],p = 0.003)。  英夫利西单抗与阿达木单抗治疗患者的SARS-CoV-2反应程度相似(中位数4.30临界指数[COI] [1.94-9.96] vs 5.02 [2.18-18.70],p = 0.164),但Vedolizumab治疗患者的SARS-CoV-2反应程度较高(中位数21.60 COI [4.39-68.10,p <0.004)。    与可检测到英夫利西单抗和阿达木单抗药物水平的患者相比,无法检测到药物水平[<0.8 mg/L]的患者更有可能出现SARS-CoV-2抗体血清阳性。在抗体检测前进行PCR检测的患者中,有三分之一未能发生血清转化,所有患者均接受了抗TNF治疗。中位时间为183.5天[129.8-235.3]后,7.9% [12/152]的患者出现后续PCR证实的SARS-CoV-2阳性,药物之间无差异。与Vedolizumab治疗的患者相比,抗TNF治疗与较低的SARS-CoV-2核衣壳血清阳性率和抗体反应性相关。尽管混杂因素(如与免疫调节剂联合治疗)可能影响结果,但抗TNF水平不可检测的患者的血清阳性率较高,支持因果关系。
Infliximab attenuates serological responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Whether this is a class effect, or if anti-tumour necrosis factor [anti-TNF] level influences serological responses, remains unknown. Seroprevalence and the magnitude of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antibody responses were measured in surplus serum from 11 422 (53.3% [6084] male; median age 36.8 years) patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, stored at six therapeutic drug monitoring laboratories between January 29 and September 30, 2020. Data were linked to nationally held SARS-CoV-2 PCR results to July 11, 2021. Rates of PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were similar across treatment groups. Seroprevalence rates were lower in infliximab- and adalimumab- than vedolizumab-treated patients (infliximab: 3.0% [178/5893], adalimumab: 3.0% [152/5074], vedolizumab: 6.7% [25/375], p = 0.003). The magnitude of SARS-CoV-2 reactivity was similar in infliximab- vs adalimumab-treated patients (median 4.30 cut-off index [COI] [1.94–9.96] vs 5.02 [2.18–18.70], p = 0.164), but higher in vedolizumab-treated patients (median 21.60 COI [4.39–68.10, p < 0.004). Compared to patients with detectable infliximab and adalimumab drug levels, patients with undetectable drug levels [<0.8 mg/L] were more likely to be seropositive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. One-third of patients who had PCR testing prior to antibody testing failed to seroconvert, all were treated with anti-TNF. Subsequent positive PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 was seen in 7.9% [12/152] of patients after a median time of 183.5 days [129.8–235.3], without differences between drugs. Anti-TNF treatment is associated with lower SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid seroprevalence and antibody reactivity when compared to vedolizumab-treated patients. Higher seropositivity rates in patients with undetectable anti-TNF levels support a causal relationship, although confounding factors, such as combination therapy with a immunomodulator, may have influenced the results.
DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.es.2021.26.20.2100428
发表时间: 2021-05
期刊: Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin
影响因子: --
作者:
Hodgson D;Flasche S;Jit M;Kucharski AJ;CMMID COVID-19 Working Group;Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Disease (CMMID) COVID-19 Working Group
通讯作者: Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Disease (CMMID) COVID-19 Working Group
DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211128
发表时间: 2017-09-01
影响因子: 27.4
作者:
Park, Jin Kyun;Lee, Min Ah;Lee, Eun Bong
通讯作者: Lee, Eun Bong
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.04.025
发表时间: 2021-08
期刊: Gastroenterology
影响因子: 29.4
作者:
Wong SY;Dixon R;Martinez Pazos V;Gnjatic S;Colombel JF;Cadwell K;ICARUS-IBD Working Group
通讯作者: ICARUS-IBD Working Group
DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-201270
发表时间: 2013-06-01
影响因子: 27.4
作者:
Salinas, Gabriela Franco;De Rycke, Leen;Baeten, Dominique
通讯作者: Baeten, Dominique
DOI: 10.1111/apt.12030
发表时间: 2012-10-01
影响因子: 7.6
作者:
Casteele, N. Vande;Buurman, D. J.;Dijkstra, G.
通讯作者: Dijkstra, G.