Informed Decisionmaking for the Sustainability of Ecopolitical Regions

Informed Decisionmaking for the Sustainability of Ecopolitical Regions
复制标题

生态政治区域可持续发展的知情决策

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
A. Vylegzhanin
A. Vylegzhanin
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
O. Young;P. Berkman;A. Vylegzhanin

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

为了提炼我们关于治理北冰洋的工作的主要贡献,本结论章侧重于两个主题:生态政治区域的治理和知情决策的实践。我们围绕五个关键问题组织对治理的讨论:(I)超越灵丹妙药,(Ii)处理机构相互作用,(Iii)避免机构僵化,(Iv)加入机构和基础设施,以及(V)开发新工具。我们对知情决策实践的主要观察涉及到在分析师和从业者之间发展端到端关系的重要性。虽然许多涉及决策支持工具的讨论侧重于帮助实践者评估与具体备选方案相关的可能后果,但我们扩大了对科学外交作用的讨论,以包括与处理议程形成和评估政策领域所作选择所产生的结果的政策周期阶段有关的贡献。
To distill the principal contributions of our work on governing Arctic seas, this concluding chapter focuses on two themes: the governance of ecopolitical regions and the practice of informed decisionmaking. We organize our discuss of governance around five key issues: (i) going beyond panaceas, (ii) dealing with institutional interplay, (iii) avoiding institutional rigidity, (iv) joining institutions and infrastructure, and (v) developing new tools. Our key observation regarding the practice of informed decisionmaking concerns the importance of developing an end-to-end relationship between analysts and practitioners. Whereas many discussions dealing with decision support tools focus on helping practitioners to assess the likely consequences associated with specific options, we broaden the discussion of the roles of science diplomacy to include contributions relating to the stages of the policy cycle dealing with agenda formation and the evaluation of the results arising from choices made in policy arenas.
巴伦支海地区的治理:现状、新出现的问题和未来的选择
DOI: 10.1080/00908320.2017.1365545
发表时间: 2017
影响因子: 1.2
作者:
Vylegzhanin, Alexander N.;Young, Oran R.;Berkman, Paul Arthur
通讯作者: Berkman, Paul Arthur