Effectiveness of peer support for improving glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Effectiveness of peer support for improving glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1186/s12889-015-1798-y
复制
发表时间:
2015-05-06
期刊:
影响因子:
4.5
通讯作者:
Xiong H
Xiong H
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Qi L;Liu Q;Qi X;Wu N;Tang W;Xiong H

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

To assess the effects of peer support at improving glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Relevant electronic databases were sought for this investigation up to Dec 2014. Randomized controlled trials involving patients with type 2 diabetes that evaluated the effect of peer support on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) concentrations were included. The pooled mean differences (MD) between intervention and control groups with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using random-effects model. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Thirteen randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Peer support resulted in a significant reduction in HbA1c (MD −0.57 [95% CI: −0.78 to −0.36]). Programs with moderate or high frequency of contact showed a significant reduction in HbA1c levels (MD −0.52 [95% CI: −0.60 to −0.44] and −0.75 [95% CI: −1.21 to −0.29], respectively), whereas programs with low frequency of contact showed no significant reduction (MD −0.32 [95% CI: −0.74 to 0.09]). The reduction in HbA1c were greater among patients with a baseline HbA1c ≥ 8.5% (MD −0.78 [95% CI: −1.06 to −0.51]) and between 7.5 ~ 8.5% (MD −0.76 [95% CI: −1.05 to −0.47]), than patients with HbA1c < 7.5% (MD −0.08 [95% CI: −0.32 to 0.16]). Peer support had a significant impact on HbA1c levels among patients with type 2 diabetes. Priority should be given to programs with moderate or high frequency of contact for target patients with poor glycemic control rather than programs with low frequency of contact that target the overall population of patients. The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1798-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
DOI: 10.1177/0145721707304133
发表时间: 2007-06-01
期刊: DIABETES EDUCATOR
影响因子: 3.9
作者:
Davis, Kia L.;O'Toole, Mary L.;Fisher, Edwin B.
通讯作者: Fisher, Edwin B.
DOI: 10.1007/s00125-007-0803-0
发表时间: 2007-11
期刊: Diabetologia
影响因子: 8.2
作者:
Nathan DM;Turgeon H;Regan S
通讯作者: Regan S
DOI: 10.1177/0145721709338527
发表时间: 2009-09-01
期刊: DIABETES EDUCATOR
影响因子: 3.9
作者:
Gazmararian, Julie A.;Ziemer, David C.;Barnes, Catherine
通讯作者: Barnes, Catherine
DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmp027
发表时间: 2010-06-01
期刊: FAMILY PRACTICE
影响因子: 2.2
作者:
Funnell, Martha Mitchell
通讯作者: Funnell, Martha Mitchell
DOI: 10.1207/s15324796abm2402_04
发表时间: 2002-03-01
影响因子: 3.8
作者:
Glasgow, RE;Funnell, MM;Wagner, EH
通讯作者: Wagner, EH