The validation status of blood biomarkers of amyloid and phospho-tau assessed with the 5-phase development framework for AD biomarkers.
The validation status of blood biomarkers of amyloid and phospho-tau assessed with the 5-phase development framework for AD biomarkers.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1007/s00259-021-05253-y
复制
发表时间:
2021-07
影响因子:
9.1
通讯作者:
Hansson O
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ashton NJ;Leuzy A;Karikari TK;Mattsson-Carlgren N;Dodich A;Boccardi M;Corre J;Drzezga A;Nordberg A;Ossenkoppele R;Zetterberg H;Blennow K;Frisoni GB;Garibotto V;Hansson O
The development of blood biomarkers that reflect Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathophysiology (phosphorylated tau and amyloid-β) has offered potential as scalable tests for dementia differential diagnosis and early detection. In 2019, the Geneva AD Biomarker Roadmap Initiative included blood biomarkers in the systematic validation of AD biomarkers. A panel of experts convened in November 2019 at a two-day workshop in Geneva. The level of maturity (fully achieved, partly achieved, preliminary evidence, not achieved, unsuccessful) of blood biomarkers was assessed based on the Biomarker Roadmap methodology and discussed fully during the workshop which also evaluated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and positron emission tomography (PET) biomarkers. Plasma p-tau has shown analytical validity (phase 2 primary aim 1) and first evidence of clinical validity (phase 3 primary aim 1), whereas the maturity level for Aβ remains to be partially achieved. Full and partial achievement has been assigned to p-tau and Aβ, respectively, in their associations to ante-mortem measures (phase 2 secondary aim 2). However, only preliminary evidence exists for the influence of covariates, assay comparison and cut-off criteria. Despite the relative infancy of blood biomarkers, in comparison to CSF biomarkers, much has already been achieved for phases 1 through 3 – with p-tau having greater success in detecting AD and predicting disease progression. However, sufficient data about the effect of covariates on the biomarker measurement is lacking. No phase 4 (real-world performance) or phase 5 (assessment of impact/cost) aim has been tested, thus not achieved.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1007/s00259-020-05120-2
发表时间:
2021-07
影响因子:
9.1
作者:
Boccardi M;Dodich A;Albanese E;Gayet-Ageron A;Festari C;Ashton NJ;Bischof GN;Chiotis K;Leuzy A;Wolters EE;Walter MA;Rabinovici GD;Carrillo M;Drzezga A;Hansson O;Nordberg A;Ossenkoppele R;Villemagne VL;Winblad B;Frisoni GB;Garibotto V
通讯作者:
Garibotto V
影响因子:
12.7
作者:
Ashton NJ;Pascoal TA;Karikari TK;Benedet AL;Lantero-Rodriguez J;Brinkmalm G;Snellman A;Schöll M;Troakes C;Hye A;Gauthier S;Vanmechelen E;Zetterberg H;Rosa-Neto P;Blennow K
通讯作者:
Blennow K
DOI:
10.1084/jem.20200861
发表时间:
2020-11-02
期刊:
The Journal of experimental medicine
影响因子:
--
作者:
Barthélemy NR;Horie K;Sato C;Bateman RJ
通讯作者:
Bateman RJ
DOI:
10.1016/j.jalz.2018.09.010
发表时间:
2019-03
期刊:
Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association
影响因子:
--
作者:
Chen Z;Mengel D;Keshavan A;Rissman RA;Billinton A;Perkinton M;Percival-Alwyn J;Schultz A;Properzi M;Johnson K;Selkoe DJ;Sperling RA;Patel P;Zetterberg H;Galasko D;Schott JM;Walsh DM
通讯作者:
Walsh DM
影响因子:
4.2
作者:
Chiotis, Konstantinos;Saint-Aubert, Laure;Nordberg, Agneta
通讯作者:
Nordberg, Agneta