Systematic review of conservation interventions to promote voluntary behavior change.
Systematic review of conservation interventions to promote voluntary behavior change.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/cobi.14000
复制
发表时间：
2023-02
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
理解人类行为对于开发有效地导致亲环境行为改变的干预措施至关重要，无论重点是在个人还是社会层面。然而，许多领域的干预措施历来缺乏强有力的评估形式，这使得人们很难相信这些保护干预措施成功地帮助保护了环境。我们进行了一项系统的回顾，以评估非金钱和非监管干预在改变环境行为方面的有效性。我们采用了健康评估和翻译办公室的系统审查方法。我们首先根据我们的搜索条件返回了30多万篇论文和报告，在对质量进行批判性评估后，确定了128项值得纳入审查的个别研究。我们根据主题领域、干预类型、受众接触干预的次数和干预运行的时间长度对干预进行分类。大多数研究报告了积极的效果(n=96)。其次最常见的结果是无效(n=28)。很少有研究报告有负面影响(n=1)或混合影响(n=3)。教育、提示和反馈干预导致了积极的行为改变。多种干预相结合是最有效的。暴露时间和频率都不影响期望的行为改变的可能性。相对较少的研究测试了自愿干预对非西方人口的影响(n=17)或测量了实际的生态结果行为(n=1)。同样，很少有研究考察节能设备(例如节能炉灶)(n=9)和示范(例如，模拟所需的行为)(n=5)。显然需要提高所进行的影响评价的质量和干预结果的报告标准。
Understanding human behavior is vital to developing interventions that effectively lead to proenvironmental behavior change, whether the focus is at the individual or societal level. However, interventions in many fields have historically lacked robust forms of evaluation, which makes it hard to be confident that these conservation interventions have successfully helped protect the environment. We conducted a systematic review to assess how effective nonpecuniary and nonregulatory interventions have been in changing environmental behavior. We applied the Office of Health Assessment and Translation systematic review methodology. We started with more than 300,000 papers and reports returned by our search terms and after critical appraisal of quality identified 128 individual studies that merited inclusion in the review. We classified interventions by thematic area, type of intervention, the number of times audiences were exposed to interventions, and the length of time interventions ran. Most studies reported a positive effect (n = 96). The next most common outcome was no effect (n = 28). Few studies reported negative (n = 1) or mixed (n = 3) effects. Education, prompts, and feedback interventions resulted in positive behavior change. Combining multiple interventions was the most effective. Neither exposure duration nor frequency affected the likelihood of desired behavioral change. Comparatively few studies tested the effects of voluntary interventions on non‐Western populations (n = 17) or measured actual ecological outcome behavior (n = 1). Similarly, few studies examined conservation devices (e.g., energy‐efficient stoves) (n = 9) and demonstrations (e.g., modeling the desired behavior) (n = 5). There is a clear need to both improve the quality of the impact evaluation conducted and the reporting standards for intervention results.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.1
作者：
ASCH, J;SHORE, BM
通讯作者：
SHORE, BM
影响因子：
4.2
作者：
Abraham, Charles;Michie, Susan
通讯作者：
Michie, Susan
DOI：
10.9745/ghsp-d-15-00126
发表时间：
2015-08-31
期刊：
Global health, science and practice
影响因子：
--
作者：
Chandra-Mouli V;Lane C;Wong S
通讯作者：
Wong S
影响因子：
5.7
作者：
Bamberg, Sebastian
通讯作者：
Bamberg, Sebastian
影响因子：
8.7
作者：
Curzon, Hannah Fay;Kontoleon, Andreas
通讯作者：
Kontoleon, Andreas