The relative importance of information items and preferred mode of delivery when disseminating results from trials to participants: A mixed-methods study.

The relative importance of information items and preferred mode of delivery when disseminating results from trials to participants: A mixed-methods study.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1111/hex.13402
复制
发表时间:
2022-03
期刊:
Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Gillies K
Gillies K
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Wood J;Cotton SC;Gillies K

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

参与者希望收到他们参与的试验的结果。传播实践是不同的,有有限的指导,提供给参与者的信息,以及如何交付it.This研究旨在建立什么样的试验参与者认为应该包括在结果总结和这些信息应该如何交付。采用混合方法设计,焦点小组和访谈涉及从两项随机对照试验中方便抽样的女性。参与者根据信息项在试验结果总结中的重要性和可能的首选交付方式对信息项进行排序。所有受试者均提供了书面知情同意书。16名女性(平均年龄[SD] = 71.6 [9.7]岁)参与研究。参与者将“研究的个体结果”和“总体试验结果总结”列为最重要的。主题,如保证和设置结果的背景下被确定为有助于参与者的决定周围的排名。“感谢您对这项研究的贡献”被列为最不重要的。邮寄是接收结果的首选方式,收到结果的硬拷贝被认为有助于查阅。我们的研究结果提供了深入了解试验参与者在收到试验结果时认为哪些信息是重要的,以及他们希望如何提供结果。让患者参与制定与参与者沟通的试验结果,有助于确保以正确的方式提供正确的信息。公共合作伙伴参与了研究实施的重点方面。
Participants want to receive the results of trials that they have participated in. Dissemination practices are disparate, and there is limited guidance available on what information to provide to participants and how to deliver it. This study aimed to establish what trial participants believe should be included in a results summary and how this information should be delivered. A mixed‐methods design was used with focus groups and interviews involving women convenience‐sampled from two host randomized‐controlled trials. Participants ranked information items in order of their importance for inclusion in a trial results summary and potential modes of delivery by preference. All participants provided written informed consent. Sixteen women (mean age [SD] = 71.6 [9.7] years) participated. Participants ranked ‘individual results from the study’ and ‘summary of overall trial results’ as most important. Themes such as reassurance and setting results in context were identified as contributing to participants' decisions around ranking. ‘A thank you for your contribution to the study’ was ranked the least important. Delivery by post was the preferred mode of receiving results, with receiving a hard copy of results cited as helpful to refer back to. Our findings provide insight into what information trial participants deem as important when receiving trial results and how they would like results delivered. Involving patients during development of trial results to be communicated to participants could help to ensure that the right information is delivered in the right way. Public partners were involved in focussed aspects of study conduct.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2010.06.009
发表时间: 2011-04
影响因子: 2.8
作者:
Cox, Karen;Moghaddam, Nima;Bird, Lydia;Elkan, Ruth
通讯作者: Elkan, Ruth
DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-7-9
发表时间: 2006-04-07
期刊: TRIALS
影响因子: 2.5
作者:
McDonald, Alison M.;Knight, Rosemary C.;Snowdon, Claire
通讯作者: Snowdon, Claire
DOI: 10.1177/1740774516665598
发表时间: 2016-12-01
期刊: CLINICAL TRIALS
影响因子: 2.7
作者:
Long, Christopher R.;Stewart, M. Kathryn;McElfish, Pearl A.
通讯作者: McElfish, Pearl A.
DOI: 10.1177/1740774511403514
发表时间: 2011-06-01
期刊: CLINICAL TRIALS
影响因子: 2.7
作者:
Dixon-Woods, Mary;Tarrant, Carolyn;Kenyon, Sara
通讯作者: Kenyon, Sara
DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-9-16
发表时间: 2008-03-21
期刊: Trials
影响因子: 2.5
作者:
Avins AL;Bent S;Padula A;Staccone S;Badua E;Goldberg H
通讯作者: Goldberg H