Normative comparisons for the evaluation of clinical significance.
Normative comparisons for the evaluation of clinical significance.
复制标题
用于评估临床意义的规范比较。
DOI：
10.1037//0022-006x.67.3.285
复制
发表时间：
1999
影响因子：
5.9
通讯作者：
R. C. Sheldrick
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
P. Kendall;A. Marrs;Sanjay R. Nath;R. C. Sheldrick
规范比较是评估治疗干预临床意义的程序。描述了该程序，包括将治疗个体的数据与正常个体的数据进行比较，并提出了在治疗结果研究的背景下进行规范比较的逐步统计方法。详细概述了该方法的四个示例。关注实施规范比较的潜在理论、统计和方法学挑战，以及规范比较在为治疗有益效果提供证据方面的优势。
Normative comparisons are a procedure for evaluating the clinical significance of therapeutic interventions. This procedure, consisting of comparing data on treated individuals with that of normative individuals, is described, and a step-by-step statistical methodology for conducting normative comparisons in the context of treatment-outcome research is presented. Four examples of the methodology are outlined in detail. Attention is paid to potential theoretical, statistical, and methodological challenges to the implementation of normative comparisons, as well as to the advantages of normative comparisons in providing evidence for the beneficial gains of treatment.
针对自杀年轻人的门诊干预的有效性：初步结果。
影响因子：
5.9
作者：
Rudd,MD;Rajab,MH;Orman,DT;Joiner,T;Stulman,DA;Dixon,W
通讯作者：
Dixon,W
影响因子：
5.9
作者：
JACOBSON, NS;TRUAX, P
通讯作者：
TRUAX, P