Workplace Democracy in the Lab

Workplace Democracy in the Lab
复制标题

实验室工作场所民主

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2011
期刊:
Social Science Research Network
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
P. Matthews
P. Matthews
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Philip Mellizo;J. Carpenter;P. Matthews

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

虽然直觉告诉我们,让员工在公司的控制中有一些发言权可能会产生有益的影响,但由于自然发生的数据中存在许多混淆因素,因此很难获得这种影响的经验证据。我们报告了一个真实努力实验的证据,证实了工人的绩效对选择补偿合同的过程是敏感的。投票决定薪酬方案的工人群体比没有发言权的工人群体付出了更多的努力。这种效应对于所实施的薪酬方案、工人特征(如能力和性别)以及可能的分类控制是稳健的。
While intuition suggests that empowering workers to have some say in the control of the firm is likely to have beneficial effects, empirical evidence of such effects is hard to come by because of numerous confounding factors in the naturally occurring data. We report evidence from a real-effort experiment confirming that worker performance is sensitive to the process used to select the compensation contract. Groups of workers that voted to determine their compensation scheme provided significantly more effort than groups that had no say in how they would be compensated. This effect is robust to controls for the compensation scheme implemented, worker characteristics such as ability and gender, and possible sorting.
DOI: 10.1002/smj.4250150908
发表时间: 1994-12-01
影响因子: 8.3
作者:
KNEZ, M;CAMERER, C
通讯作者: CAMERER, C