How to water a thousand flowers. On the logic of logical pluralism
How to water a thousand flowers. On the logic of logical pluralism
复制标题
如何浇灌一千朵花。
DOI：
10.1080/0020174x.2017.1370064
复制
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
1.3
通讯作者：
Maria Paola Sforza Fogliani
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Sereni;Maria Paola Sforza Fogliani
逻辑多元主义者在为他们的观点辩护时，采用了多少逻辑，或者允许采用多少逻辑，或者应该采用多少逻辑？这些元理论问题隐藏在关于逻辑多元主义的许多讨论背后，并直接关系到关于正确逻辑的选择和有效推理的表征的规范性问题。尽管如此，他们通常只得到迅速的答复-如果有的话。我们的目标是正面解决这些问题，通过澄清逻辑多元主义者在涉及其立场的元理论时所拥有的可能性范围，并通过阐明哪些路线是可取的。我们探讨所有相关的反应，我们的问题的后果：没有逻辑，一个单一的逻辑，一个以上的逻辑。最后，我们对任何提出的答案是否可行表示怀疑。这威胁到当前和未来版本的逻辑多元主义的连贯性。
Abstract How many logics do logical pluralists adopt, or are allowed to adopt, or ought to adopt, in arguing for their view? These metatheoretical questions lurk behind much of the discussion on logical pluralism, and have a direct bearing on normative issues concerning the choice of a correct logic and the characterization of valid reasoning. Still, they commonly receive just swift answers – if any. Our aim is to tackle these questions head on, by clarifying the range of possibilities that logical pluralists have at their disposal when it comes to the metatheory of their position, and by spelling out which routes are advisable. We explore ramifications of all relevant responses to our question: no logic, a single logic, more than one logic. In the end, we express skepticism that any proposed answer is viable. This threatens the coherence of current and future versions of logical pluralism.
关于逻辑的反例外主义
影响因子：
1.3
作者：
Ole Thomassen Hjortland
通讯作者：
Ole Thomassen Hjortland