Validation of a Rapid Method to Assess Habitual Beverage Intake Patterns.
Validation of a Rapid Method to Assess Habitual Beverage Intake Patterns.
复制标题
DOI：
10.3390/nu10010083
复制
发表时间：
2018-01-13
期刊：
影响因子：
5.9
通讯作者：
Davy BM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hedrick VE;Myers EA;Zoellner JM;Duffey KJ;Davy BM
健康饮料指数（HBI）是一种新兴的评估饮料模式质量的方法。HBI总分从0到100，分数越高表明对建议饮料的遵守程度越高。然而，评估模式是资源密集型的，因为需要大量的饮食数据，通常是24小时饮食记录或回忆。BEVQ-15是一种饮料摄入量问卷，可作为快速测量HBI评分的替代方法。本横断面调查的目的是评估HBI-Q的比较有效性，与通过饮食回忆/记录获得HBI评分的传统方法相比，HBI-Q是一种通过BEVQ-15快速评估HBI评分的方法。在2012年至2016年期间，弗吉尼亚州西南部成年人的横断面样本完成了三次24小时饮食回忆（每次回忆的给药和分析时间为30-60分钟）和BEVQ-15（给药时间为3-4分钟）。通过两种方法生成HBI评分，并通过配对样本t检验、相关性和Bland-Altman分析进行比较。在404名成人（平均年龄= 40岁）中，HBI-Q的总平均HBI评分为63.7分，回忆的总平均HBI评分为67.3分（平均差异= 3.6/100; r = 0.63;均p ≤ 0.001）。通过Bland-Altman图，两种方法之间的总HBI评分一致率为92%。使用HBI-Q快速评估成人HBI评分将通过减少所需的时间和资源来增加HBI的实用性，从而使研究人员和从业人员能够提供有针对性的反馈以进行改进。
The Healthy Beverage Index (HBI) is an emerging approach to assess beverage pattern quality. HBI total scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater adherence to proposed beverage recommendations. However, assessing patterns is resource-intensive due to the need for extensive dietary data, typically 24-h dietary records or recalls. The BEVQ-15, a beverage intake questionnaire, may be used as an alternative method to rapidly measure HBI scores. The objective of this cross-sectional investigation is to assess the comparative validity of the HBI-Q, a method to rapidly assess HBI scores via the BEVQ-15, as compared to the traditional method of deriving HBI scores via dietary recalls/records. Between 2012 and 2016, a cross-sectional sample of adults in southwest Virginia completed three 24-h dietary recalls (30–60 min administration and analysis time per recall) and the BEVQ-15 (3–4 min administration time). HBI scores were generated by both methods, and compared via paired-samples t-tests, correlations, and Bland–Altman analysis. Among 404 adults (mean age = 40 years), total mean HBI scores were 63.7 from the HBI-Q and 67.3 from the recalls (mean difference = 3.6 out of 100; r = 0.63; both p ≤ 0.001). Agreement between the two methods for total HBI scores via Bland–Altman plots was 92%. Using the HBI-Q to rapidly assess HBI scores in adults will increase the utility of the HBI by decreasing the time and resources required, thus allowing researchers and practitioners to provide targeted feedback for improvement.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.3
作者：
Giavarina D
通讯作者：
Giavarina D
DOI：
10.2307/2987937
发表时间：
1983-01-01
期刊：
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES D-THE STATISTICIAN
影响因子：
--
作者：
ALTMAN, DG;BLAND, JM
通讯作者：
BLAND, JM
影响因子：
--
作者：
Hedrick, Valisa E.;Comber, Dana L.;Davy, Brenda M.
通讯作者：
Davy, Brenda M.
影响因子：
6.9
作者：
Dennis, Elizabeth A.;Dengo, Ana Laura;Comber, Dana L.;Flack, Kyle D.;Savla, Jyoti;Davy, Kevin P.;Davy, Brenda M.
通讯作者：
Davy, Brenda M.
影响因子：
6.1
作者：
Daniels MC;Popkin BM
通讯作者：
Popkin BM