Validation of the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale across the Anxiety Disorders Although There Are Several Self-report Measures of Social Anxi
Validation of the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale across the Anxiety Disorders Although There Are Several Self-report Measures of Social Anxi
复制标题
尽管有多种社交焦虑自我报告措施，但跨焦虑症的社交互动焦虑量表和社交恐惧症量表的验证
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
--
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
A. Brown
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
E. Brown;Julia Turovsky;R. Heimberg;H. Juster;T. Brown;D. Barlow;York Timothy;A. Brown
在焦虑患者和正常对照组中评估了被他人观察时的焦虑程度。社交恐惧症患者在两个量表上的得分都更高，并且比其他焦虑患者（SPS上的广场恐惧症患者除外）或对照组更容易被确定为患有社交恐惧症。临床医生评定的社交恐怖症严重程度与SIAS和SPS评分中度相关。在社交恐怖症患者中，额外的情绪或惊恐障碍诊断并不影响SIAS或SPS评分，但额外的广泛性焦虑障碍诊断与较高的SIAS评分相关。报告的恐惧的社会互动的情况下，更高度相关的SIAS的分数，而报告的恐惧的性能的情况下，更高度相关的SPS分数。这些量表似乎是有用的筛选，设计个性化的治疗，并评估社交恐惧症的治疗结果。社交恐惧症在《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第三版中首次被引入精神病学术语中（《精神疾病诊断和统计手册》第三版;美国精神病学协会，1980年），此后一直是DSM-1V诊断定义的一部分（第416页）对一个或多个社交或表演场合的明显和持续的恐惧，在这些场合中，一个人暴露在不熟悉的人面前，或可能受到他人的审视。个人害怕他或她会以一种羞辱或尴尬的方式行事（或表现出焦虑症状）。虽然社交恐惧症的诊断已经建立了十多年，但直到最近，研究人员才开始研究其评估和治疗。为了准确地诊断社交恐惧症并评估治疗效果，可以有效地测量其各种元素的评估设备是电子邮件，可以通过互联网发送到rheimber @ nimbus. ocis. temple. edu。然而，很少有人评估过害怕或避免的情况类型的差异。这些工具包括社交恐惧症子量表。前三个量表在社交恐惧症评估中的局限性在其他地方已经讨论过（Heimberg，Mueller，Holt，Hope，& Liebowitz，1992）。虽然社交恐惧症和焦虑量表评估了广泛的社交情境，并有大量数据支持其在社交恐惧症患者中的可靠性和有效性，但它并没有为不同类型的焦虑激发情境提供单独的评分。评估不同类别的情况下的焦虑反应，应该有实用的个性化治疗干预社交恐惧症患者的计划。一套...
a measure of anxiety while being observed by others, was evaluated in anxious patients and normal controls. Social phobia patients scored higher on both scales and were more likely to be identified as having social phobia than other anxious patients (except for agoraphobic patients on the SPS) or controls. Clinician-rated severity of social phobia was moderately related to SIAS and SPS scores. Additional diagnoses of mood or panic disorder did not affect SIAS or SPS scores among social phobia patients, but an additional diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder was associated with higher SIAS scores. Number of reported feared social interaction situations was more highly correlated with scores on the SIAS, whereas number of reported feared performance situations was more highly correlated with scores on the SPS. These scales appear to be useful in screening, designing individualized treatments, and evaluating the outcomes of treatments for social phobia. Social phobia was first introduced into the psychiatric nomenclature in the third edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III; American Psychiatric Association, 1980) and has since remained a part of the diagnos-defined in DSM-1V (p. 416) as "a marked and persistent fear of one or more social or performance situations in which the person is exposed to unfamiliar people or to possible scrutiny by others. The individual fears that he or she will act in a way (or show anxiety symptoms) that will be humiliating or embarrassing." Although the diagnosis of social phobia has been established for over a decade, only recently have researchers begun to investigate its assessment and treatment To accurately diagnose social phobia and evaluate treatment efficacy, assessment devices that effectively measure its various elements are Electronic mail may be sent via Internet to rheimber @nimbus.ocis.temple.edu. 21 ety, few have assessed differences in the types of situations feared or avoided. These devices include the Social Phobia sub-The limitations of the first three scales in the assessment of social phobia have been discussed elsewhere (Heimberg, Mueller, Holt, Hope, & Liebowitz, 1992). Although the Social Phobia and Anxiety Inventory assesses a broad range of social situations and has substantial data supporting its reliability and validity among patients with social phobia, it does not provide separate scores for different types of anxiety-provoking situations. Assessment of anxiety responses to different classes of situations should have utility for the planning of individualized treatment interventions for patients with social phobia. A set of …
当代社交恐惧症口头报告工具的评估。
影响因子：
4.1
作者：
Ries,BJ;McNeil,DW;Boone,ML;Turk,CL;Carter,LE;Heimberg,RG
通讯作者：
Heimberg,RG
影响因子：
4.1
作者：
MEYER, TJ;MILLER, ML;BORKOVEC, TD
通讯作者：
BORKOVEC, TD