Innovation in the Knowledge Age: implications for collaborative science

Innovation in the Knowledge Age: implications for collaborative science
复制标题

知识时代的创新:对协作科学的影响

DOI:
10.1007/s10669-016-9610-9
复制
发表时间:
2017
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Hannah, Mark A.
Hannah, Mark A.
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hinrichs, Margaret M.;Seager, Thomas P.;Tracy, Sarah J.;Hannah, Mark A.

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

Current trends validate the notion that multifaceted, multimodal interdisciplinary collaborations lead to increased research productivity in publications and citations, compared to those achieved by individual researchers. Moreover, it may be that scientific breakthroughs are increasingly achieved by interdisciplinary research teams. Nonetheless, despite the perceived importance of collaboration and its bibliometric benefits, today’s scientists are still trained to be autonomous, work individually, and encourage their graduate students to do the same—perpetuating values which impede the creation of collaborative space between disciplines. As a consequence, scientists working in teams typically report serious obstacles to collaboration. This paper builds off of recent recommendations from a 2015 National Academies report on the state of team science which emphasizes greater definition of roles, responsibility, accountability, goals, and milestones. However, these recommendations do not address the subjective, relational components of collaboration which can drive innovation and creativity. The relational side of collaboration is key to understanding the capacity and capabilities of the knowledge workers, such as scientists and engineers, who comprise interdisciplinary research teams. The authors’ recommendations, grounded in organizational communication and knowledge worker literature, include a renewed focus on the process of organizing through communication rather than focusing on organization as an outcome or consequence of teamwork, leading and cultivating team members rather than managing them, and the need to address self-driven, rather than external, motivations to engage in knowledge work.
DOI: 10.3152/095820211x12941371876580
发表时间: 2011-06-01
影响因子: 3.3
作者:
Falk-Krzesinski HJ;Contractor N;Fiore SM;Hall KL;Kane C;Keyton J;Klein JT;Spring B;Stokols D;Trochim W
通讯作者: Trochim W
交流专业知识:专业服务公司的知识绩效
DOI: --
发表时间: 2012
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
J. Treem
通讯作者: J. Treem
知识工作者绩效的神秘艺术与科学
DOI: --
发表时间: 2002
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
T. Davenport;R. Thomas;S. Cantrell
通讯作者: S. Cantrell
协商学者与实践者之间的界限
DOI: --
发表时间: 2002
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Timothy Kuhn
通讯作者: Timothy Kuhn
DOI: --
发表时间: 2002
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Joel O. Iverson;Robert D. McPhee
通讯作者: Robert D. McPhee