Overcoming attenuation bias in regressions using polygenic indices.
Overcoming attenuation bias in regressions using polygenic indices.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1038/s41467-023-40069-4
复制
发表时间:
2023-07-25
影响因子:
16.6
通讯作者:
Rietveld, Cornelius A.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
van Kippersluis, Hans;Biroli, Pietro;Dias Pereira, Rita;Galama, Titus J.;von Hinke, Stephanie;Meddens, S. Fleur W.;Muslimova, Dilnoza;Slob, Eric A. W.;de Vlaming, Ronald;Rietveld, Cornelius A.
Measurement error in polygenic indices (PGIs) attenuates the estimation of their effects in regression models. We analyze and compare two approaches addressing this attenuation bias: Obviously Related Instrumental Variables (ORIV) and the PGI Repository Correction (PGI-RC). Through simulations, we show that the PGI-RC performs slightly better than ORIV, unless the prediction sample is very small (N < 1000) or when there is considerable assortative mating. Within families, ORIV is the best choice since the PGI-RC correction factor is generally not available. We verify the empirical validity of the simulations by predicting educational attainment and height in a sample of siblings from the UK Biobank. We show that applying ORIV between families increases the standardized effect of the PGI by 12% (height) and by 22% (educational attainment) compared to a meta-analysis-based PGI, yet estimates remain slightly below the PGI-RC estimates. Furthermore, within-family ORIV regression provides the tightest lower bound for the direct genetic effect, increasing the lower bound for the standardized direct genetic effect on educational attainment from 0.14 to 0.18 (+29%), and for height from 0.54 to 0.61 (+13%) compared to a meta-analysis-based PGI. Measurement error in polygenic indices attenuates their power to predict complex traits. Here, the authors compare two approaches addressing this attenuation bias and provide guidance on which approach to apply in various scenarios.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
11
作者:
Davies G;Marioni RE;Liewald DC;Hill WD;Hagenaars SP;Harris SE;Ritchie SJ;Luciano M;Fawns-Ritchie C;Lyall D;Cullen B;Cox SR;Hayward C;Porteous DJ;Evans J;McIntosh AM;Gallacher J;Craddock N;Pell JP;Smith DJ;Gale CR;Deary IJ
通讯作者:
Deary IJ
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
Bycroft C;Freeman C;Petkova D;Band G;Elliott LT;Sharp K;Motyer A;Vukcevic D;Delaneau O;O'Connell J;Cortes A;Welsh S;Young A;Effingham M;McVean G;Leslie S;Allen N;Donnelly P;Marchini J
通讯作者:
Marchini J
影响因子:
2.1
作者:
Dudbridge F
通讯作者:
Dudbridge F
影响因子:
5.9
作者:
de Vlaming R;Slob EAW;Jansen PR;Dagher A;Koellinger PD;Groenen PJF;Rietveld CA
通讯作者:
Rietveld CA
影响因子:
7.2
作者:
Belsky, Daniel W.;Harden, K. Paige
通讯作者:
Harden, K. Paige