Upper-extremity and mobility subdomains from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) adult physical functioning item bank.
Upper-extremity and mobility subdomains from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) adult physical functioning item bank.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.apmr.2013.05.014
复制
发表时间：
2013-11
影响因子：
4.3
通讯作者：
Krishnan, Eswar
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hays, Ron D.;Spritzer, Karen L.;Amtmann, Dagmar;Lai, Jin-Shei;DeWitt, Esi Morgan;Rothrock, Nan;DeWalt, Darren A.;Riley, William T.;Fries, James F.;Krishnan, Eswar
根据患者报告结局测量信息系统（PROMIS）身体功能成人项目库创建上肢和活动子域评分。专家评审用于从PROMIS项目库中识别上肢和活动项目。进行心理测量分析，以评估经验支持得分上肢和流动性子域。通过自我管理调查从美国普通人群和多个疾病组收集数据。样本（N= 21，773）包括21，133名参加PROMIS第1波数据收集的讲英语的成年人和640名单独招募的讲西班牙语的拉丁美洲成年人。不适用因我们使用英语和西班牙语的数据和现有的PROMIS项目参数的身体功能项目库，估计上肢和流动性评分。此外，我们拟合分级反应模型，分别校准上肢项目和流动性项目，比较单独的组合校准，并产生子域分数。由于局部依赖性而删除项目后，仍有16个项目用于评估上肢，17个项目用于评估活动性。使用现有PROMIS身体功能项目参数，上肢和活动性之间的估计相关性为0.59（使用分别针对上肢和活动性项目校准的参数，r= 0.60）。上肢和移动子域共享约35%的共同的方差，并产生可比的分数是否单独或一起校准。利用身体功能的这2个方面并使用现有PROMIS参数评分的项目子集的识别提供了除了总体身体功能评分之外对这些子域进行评分的选项。
To create upper-extremity and mobility subdomain scores from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical functioning adult item bank. Expert reviews were used to identify upper-extremity and mobility items from the PROMIS item bank. Psychometric analyses were conducted to assess empirical support for scoring upper-extremity and mobility subdomains. Data were collected from the U.S. general population and multiple disease groups via self-administered surveys. The sample (N=21,773) included 21,133 English-speaking adults who participated in the PROMIS wave 1 data collection and 640 Spanish-speaking Latino adults recruited separately. Not applicable. We used English- and Spanish-language data and existing PROMIS item parameters for the physical functioning item bank to estimate upper-extremity and mobility scores. In addition, we fit graded response models to calibrate the upper-extremity items and mobility items separately, compare separate to combined calibrations, and produce subdomain scores. After eliminating items because of local dependency, 16 items remained to assess upper extremity and 17 items to assess mobility. The estimated correlation between upper extremity and mobility was .59 using existing PROMIS physical functioning item parameters (r=.60 using parameters calibrated separately for upper-extremity and mobility items). Upper-extremity and mobility subdomains shared about 35% of the variance in common, and produced comparable scores whether calibrated separately or together. The identification of the subset of items tapping these 2 aspects of physical functioning and scored using the existing PROMIS parameters provides the option of scoring these subdomains in addition to the overall physical functioning score.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
7.2
作者：
Rose, M.;Bjomer, J. B.;Ware, J. E.
通讯作者：
Ware, J. E.
影响因子：
4.3
作者：
Hays, RD;Hahn, H;Marshall, G
通讯作者：
Marshall, G
影响因子：
7.2
作者：
DeWitt, Esi Morgan;Stucky, Brian D.;Thissen, David;Irwin, Debra E.;Langer, Michelle;Varni, James W.;Lai, Jin-Shei;Yeatts, Karin B.;DeWalt, Darren A.
通讯作者：
DeWalt, Darren A.
影响因子：
3
作者：
Hays, Ron D.;Liu, Honghu;Cella, David
通讯作者：
Cella, David
影响因子：
3.9
作者：
Fries, James F.;Cella, David;Bruce, Bonnie
通讯作者：
Bruce, Bonnie