Decisions to Choose COVID-19 Vaccination by Health Care Workers in a Southern California Safety Net Medical Center Vary by Sociodemographic Factors.
Decisions to Choose COVID-19 Vaccination by Health Care Workers in a Southern California Safety Net Medical Center Vary by Sociodemographic Factors.
复制标题
DOI:
10.3390/vaccines10081247
复制
发表时间:
2022-08-03
期刊:
影响因子:
7.8
通讯作者:
Gatto, Nicole M.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Garcia, Lauren;Firek, Anthony;Freund, Deborah;Massai, Donatella;Khurana, Dhruv;Lee, Jerusha E.;Zamarripa, Susanna;Sasaninia, Bijan;Michaels, Kelsey;Nightingale, Judi;Gatto, Nicole M.
关键词:
Background: Limited information exists regarding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among healthcare workers (HCWs). Our previous survey analyzed the reasons for HCWs’ decisions to accept vaccination, suggesting that a “one-size fits all” approach may not suffice to increase vaccine uptake. Methods: Based on the vaccination acceptance group (acceptor, hesitant, refuser), we examined differences by sociodemographic factors (race/ethnicity, household income, education) from Likert Scale responses to fourteen influences affecting a decision to be vaccinated using the Kruskal–Wallis test and multinomial logistic regression with mutual adjustment for these sociodemographic factors, age, and sex. Results: Non-Hispanic White vaccine acceptors ranked lower confidence in preventing, withstanding, or treating COVID-19, while Non-Hispanic Blacks more highly regarded the motivation of a religious leader, colleague, or family member. Social media was ranked more influential among Non-Hispanic Asians. Acceptors with lower incomes ranked a job requirement influential; conversely, higher income vaccine hesitant HCWs highly rated this reason. More highly educated acceptors ranked being motivated by colleagues, family, and other HCWs higher. Adjustment weakened some but not all the differences between groups. Conclusions: Sociodemographic factors affect HCWs’ decisions to be vaccinated against COVID-19. Our findings may help develop more focused and tailored strategies to improve vaccination acceptance.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
13.8
作者:
Green-McKenzie J;Shofer FS;Momplaisir F;Kuter BJ;Kruse G;Bialal U;Behta M;O'Donnell J;Al-Ramahi N;Kasbekar N;Sullivan P;Okala P;Brennan PJ
通讯作者:
Brennan PJ
DOI:
10.3390/ijerph18179342
发表时间:
2021-09-04
影响因子:
--
作者:
AlShurman BA;Khan AF;Mac C;Majeed M;Butt ZA
通讯作者:
Butt ZA
影响因子:
5.1
作者:
Higgins ST;Klemperer EM;Coleman SRM
通讯作者:
Coleman SRM
影响因子:
2.9
作者:
Enticott J;Gill JS;Bacon SL;Lavoie KL;Epstein DS;Dawadi S;Teede HJ;Boyle J;iCARE Study Team
通讯作者:
iCARE Study Team
影响因子:
11.8
作者:
Halbrook, Megan;Gadoth, Adva;Rimoin, Anne W.
通讯作者:
Rimoin, Anne W.