Ensemble Learning for Breast Cancer Lesion Classification: A Pilot Validation Using Correlated Spectroscopic Imaging and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging.
Ensemble Learning for Breast Cancer Lesion Classification: A Pilot Validation Using Correlated Spectroscopic Imaging and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging.
复制标题
DOI:
10.3390/metabo13070835
复制
发表时间:
2023-07-11
期刊:
影响因子:
4.1
通讯作者:
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
The main objective of this work was to evaluate the application of individual and ensemble machine learning models to classify malignant and benign breast masses using features from two-dimensional (2D) correlated spectroscopy spectra extracted from five-dimensional echo-planar correlated spectroscopic imaging (5D EP-COSI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Twenty-four different metabolite and lipid ratios with respect to diagonal fat peaks (1.4 ppm, 5.4 ppm) from 2D spectra, and water and fat peaks (4.7 ppm, 1.4 ppm) from one-dimensional non-water-suppressed (NWS) spectra were used as the features. Additionally, water fraction, fat fraction and water-to-fat ratios from NWS spectra and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) from DWI were included. The nine most important features were identified using recursive feature elimination, sequential forward selection and correlation analysis. XGBoost (AUC: 93.0%, Accuracy: 85.7%, F1-score: 88.9%, Precision: 88.2%, Sensitivity: 90.4%, Specificity: 84.6%) and GradientBoost (AUC: 94.3%, Accuracy: 89.3%, F1-score: 90.7%, Precision: 87.9%, Sensitivity: 94.2%, Specificity: 83.4%) were the best-performing models. Conventional biomarkers like choline, myo-Inositol, and glycine were statistically significant predictors. Key features contributing to the classification were ADC, 2D diagonal peaks at 0.9 ppm, 2.1 ppm, 3.5 ppm, and 5.4 ppm, cross peaks between 1.4 and 0.9 ppm, 4.3 and 4.1 ppm, 2.3 and 1.6 ppm, and the triglyceryl–fat cross peak. The results highlight the contribution of the 2D spectral peaks to the model, and they demonstrate the potential of 5D EP-COSI for early breast cancer detection.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
--
作者:
通讯作者:
--
影响因子:
3.8
作者:
Chen X;Li WL;Zhang YL;Wu Q;Guo YM;Bai ZL
通讯作者:
Bai ZL
影响因子:
4.7
作者:
Prvulovic Bunovic N;Sveljo O;Kozic D;Boban J
通讯作者:
Boban J
DOI:
10.1002/jmri.25909
发表时间:
2018-07
期刊:
Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI
影响因子:
--
作者:
Amornsiripanitch N;Nguyen VT;Rahbar H;Hippe DS;Gadi VK;Rendi MH;Partridge SC
通讯作者:
Partridge SC
影响因子:
4.1
作者:
Haukaas TH;Euceda LR;Giskeødegård GF;Bathen TF
通讯作者:
Bathen TF