Case Study Methods in the International Relations Subfield
Case Study Methods in the International Relations Subfield
复制标题
国际关系子领域的案例研究方法
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2007
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Colin Elman
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Andrew Bennett;Colin Elman
本文回顾了案例研究方法在美国国际关系（IR）研究中所发挥的关键作用。 IR 子领域的案例研究并不是批评者所谴责的那些互不相关、无理论且具体的研究。 IR 案例研究遵循越来越标准化和严格的规定，并与统计和正式工作一起，逐渐增进了对世界政治的理解。文章讨论并回顾了案例选择标准的示例（包括最不可能、最不相似、异常案例）；观念创新；类型逻辑理论、解释类型学、定性比较分析和模糊集分析；流程追踪；以及多种方法的整合。
This article reviews the key role that case study methods have played in the study of international relations (IR) in the United States. Case studies in the IR subfield are not the unconnected, atheoretical, and idiographic studies that their critics decry. IR case studies follow an increasingly standardized and rigorous set of prescriptions and have, together with statistical and formal work, contributed to cumulatively improving understandings of world politics. The article discusses and reviews examples of case selection criteria (including least likely, least and most similar, and deviant cases); conceptual innovation; typo-logical theories, explanatory typologies, qualitative comparative analysis, and fuzzy-set analysis; process tracing; and the integration of multiple methods.
催眠历史：对批评者的答复。
DOI：
10.1080/00029157.2007.10524502
发表时间：
2007
期刊：
The American journal of clinical hypnosis
影响因子：
--
作者：
Kirsch,Irving;Mazzoni,Giuliana;Montgomery,GuyH
通讯作者：
Montgomery,GuyH