Human rights and HIV: rhetoric or determinants?
Human rights and HIV: rhetoric or determinants?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013571
复制
发表时间：
2023-10
影响因子：
8.1
通讯作者：
Amon, Joseph J.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hinman, Kati;Amon, Joseph J.
关键词：
国际捐助者和联合国机构强调人权作为艾滋病毒脆弱性以及获得、接受和保留艾滋病毒预防和治疗服务的关键决定因素的重要性。然而，艾滋病毒研究人员在多大程度上将权利纳入他们的研究、正在审查的具体权利以及评估基于权利的方法的研究频率尚不清楚。我们检查了五种影响因子最高的 HIV 期刊上发表的所有文章：(1) Lancet HIV； (2) 艾滋病与行为； (3)艾滋病； (4) 国际艾滋病协会杂志（JIAS）； (5) 获得性免疫缺陷综合症杂志 (JAIDS)，2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日期间，提及“人权”或“权利”。我们分析文章以评估：(1) 确定了哪些人群与特定人权问题相关； (2) 提到了哪些具体权利； （3）研究人员是否引用了具体的法律框架； (4) 是否审查了基于权利的干预措施以及何种类型的干预措施。总体而言，在所审查的 8080 篇文章中，有 2.8% (n=224) 提到了“人权”或“权利”。其中 42% (n=94) 是原创研究文章。最常见的关键人群是男男性行为者（33 篇文章），其次是性工作者（21 篇文章）和跨性别者（14 篇文章）。在 94 篇文章中，11 篇提到健康权，9 篇提到生殖权。很少有文章指出具体的权威——无论是在国家、地区还是国际法中——作为所引用权利的基础。十四篇文章讨论了基于权利的干预措施。尽管全球认识到人权对艾滋病毒结果的重要性，但在被引用的前五名艾滋病毒期刊上发表文章的艾滋病毒研究人员很少在其研究中关注人权或基于权利的干预措施。当提到权利时，往往没有具体说明或承认人权的法律基础。
International donors and UN agencies emphasise the importance of human rights as a key determinant of HIV vulnerability and of access, uptake and retention in HIV prevention and treatment services. Yet, the extent to which HIV researchers are incorporating rights into their research, the specific rights being examined and the frequency of research assessing rights-based approaches, is unknown. We examined all articles published in the five highest impact-factor HIV journals: (1) Lancet HIV; (2) AIDS and Behavior; (3) AIDS; (4) Journal of the International AIDS Society (JIAS); and (5) Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes (JAIDS), between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2022, for reference to ‘human right(s)’ or ‘right(s)’. We analysed articles to assess: (1) what populations were identified in relation to specific human rights concerns; (2) what specific rights were mentioned; (3) whether researchers cited specific legal frameworks; and (4) if and what types of rights-based interventions were examined. Overall, 2.8% (n=224) of the 8080 articles reviewed included a mention of ‘human right(s)’ or ‘right(s)’. Forty-two per cent of these (n=94) were original research articles. The most common key population discussed was men who have sex with men (33 articles), followed by sex workers (21 articles) and transgender people (14 articles). Of the 94 articles, 11 mentioned the right to health and nine referenced reproductive rights. Few articles identified a specific authority—whether in national, regional or international law—for the basis of the rights cited. Fourteen articles discussed rights-based interventions. Despite global recognition of the importance of human rights to HIV outcomes, few HIV researchers publishing in the top five cited HIV journals include attention to human rights, or rights-based interventions, in their research. When rights are mentioned, it is often without specificity or recognition of the legal basis for human rights.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
168.9
作者：
Jurgens, Ralf;Csete, Joanne;Beyrer, Chris
通讯作者：
Beyrer, Chris
影响因子：
15.8
作者：
Amon, Joseph J.;Eba, Patrick;Beyrer, Chris
通讯作者：
Beyrer, Chris
DOI：
10.1097/qai.0000000000001310
发表时间：
2017-05-01
影响因子：
3.6
作者：
Lyons, Carrie E.;Grosso, Ashley;Baral, Stefan
通讯作者：
Baral, Stefan
影响因子：
4.4
作者：
Goggin, Kathy;Hurley, Emily A.;Wagner, Glenn J.;Staggs, Vincent;Finocchario-Kessler, Sarah;Beyeza-Kashesya, Jolly;Mindry, Deborah;Birungi, Josephine;Wanyenze, Rhoda K.
通讯作者：
Wanyenze, Rhoda K.
影响因子：
6
作者：
通讯作者：
--