Schools Out: Adam Smith and Pre-disciplinary International Political Economy
Schools Out: Adam Smith and Pre-disciplinary International Political Economy
复制标题
停课：亚当·斯密和预科国际政治经济学
DOI：
10.1080/13563467.2014.999757
复制
发表时间：
2015
影响因子：
4.2
通讯作者：
Glaze S
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Glaze S
在本文中，我认为，在国际政治经济学（IPE）中，对亚当·斯密（Adam Smith）的引用经常揭示出经济和非经济理性的学科本体论分解的影响，我声称，这种影响被用竞争学派来描绘其复杂的智力轮廓的趋势所掩盖。我将斯密作为国际政治经济学自由主义传统创始人的学科特征溯源至奥地利、芝加哥和德国历史经济学派的核心重要人物对他思想的引用，并反思了所谓的美国和英国学派的明显成员对这一形象的重申对国际政治经济学的意义。此外，我还将这些解释与那些试图用学科前术语解释国际政治经济学和史密斯对其贡献的学者提出的解释进行了对比，我声称，这反映了一种独特的本体论，这种本体论归因于英国国际政治经济学学派，他们的工作经常与之联系在一起。因此，我认为，对国际政治经济学中引用史密斯思想的反思，提出了用竞争学派来描绘其知识领域的长期趋势的问题，揭示了告知这种趋势的学科本体论共识对其核心关注点的表达产生了影响，并表明，学科前方法提供了另一种视角，通过这种视角，这些关注点可能会更有效地框架化。
In this article, I argue that invocations of Adam Smith in international political economy (IPE) often reveal the influence therein of a disciplinary ontological disaggregation of economic and non-economic rationality, which I claim is obscured by the tendency to map its complex intellectual contours in terms of competing schools. I trace the origins of the disciplinary characterisation of Smith as the founder of IPE's liberal tradition to invocations of his thought by centrally important figures in the perceived Austrian, Chicago and German historical schools of economics, and reflect upon the significance to IPE of the reiteration of this portrayal by apparent members of its so-called American and British schools. I additionally contrast these interpretations to those put forward by scholars who seek to interpret IPE and Smith's contribution to it in pre-disciplinary terms, which I claim reflects a distinct ontology to that attributed to the British school of IPE with which their work is often associated. I therefore contend that reflection upon invocations of Smith's thought in IPE problematises the longstanding tendency to map its intellectual terrain in terms of competing schools, reveals that the disciplinary ontological consensus that informs this tendency impacts upon articulations of its core concerns and suggests that a pre-disciplinary approach offers an alternative lens through which such concerns might be more effectively framed.
登录
查看更多内容
旧的 IPE 和新的 IPE
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2009
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
R. Keohane
通讯作者：
R. Keohane
亚当·斯密的背景
影响因子：
0.7
作者：
L. Montes
通讯作者：
L. Montes
经济思想中的社会学要素：一、历史
影响因子：
13.7
作者：
T. Parsons
通讯作者：
T. Parsons
亚当·斯密论宗教
DOI：
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199605064.013.0023
发表时间：
2013
影响因子：
4.3
作者：
G. Kennedy
通讯作者：
G. Kennedy
亚当·斯密：批判理论家？
影响因子：
12.6
作者：
K. Tribe
通讯作者：
K. Tribe