Relationship between spinal reflexes and leg motor function in sub-acute and chronic stroke patients
Relationship between spinal reflexes and leg motor function in sub-acute and chronic stroke patients
复制标题
亚急性和慢性脑卒中患者脊髓反射与腿部运动功能的关系
DOI:
10.1016/j.clinph.2022.02.025
复制
发表时间:
2022
影响因子:
4.7
通讯作者:
Meigen Liu
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Yoko Takahashi;Michiyuki Kawakami;Rena Mikami;Toshiya Nakajima;Towa Nagumo;Tomofumi Yamaguchi;Kaoru Honaga;Kunitsugu Kondo;Ryota Ishii;Toshiyuki Fujiwara;Meigen Liu
ObjectiveTo assess the relationship between spinal reflexes and motor function in sub-acute (SAS) and chronic stroke (CS) patients.MethodsTwelve SAS and 16 CS patients underwent electrophysiological assessment of heteronymous facilitation (HF), heteronymous inhibition (HI), disynaptic reciprocal inhibition (DRI), and D1 inhibition (D1). The Fugl-Meyer Assessment Lower Extremity (FMA-LE) and modified Ashworth scale (MAS) were assessed. The relationship between spinal reflexes and motor function was examined in a cross-sectional manner. SAS patients were also longitudinally evaluated before and after intensive rehabilitation for approximately 2 months.ResultsSAS patients with triceps surae muscle spasticity (MAS ≥ 1) showed higher HF values (p = 0.03) than those without spasticity. SAS patients with quadriceps muscle spasticity showed higher HF values (p < 0.01); patients with hamstring muscle spasticity showed higher DRI value (disinhibition) (p < 0.01) than those without spasticity. CS patients showed no significant correlation between spinal reflexes and motor function. The longitudinal study revealed a significant correlation between increase in D1 inhibition and FMA-LE improvement in SAS patients (r = 0.69).ConclusionsThe association between impaired spinal reflexes varies with the stage of stroke; HF and DRI may be spasticity indicators in SAS patients.SignificanceSpinal reflexes as potential biomarkers may facilitate tailor-made rehabilitation of stroke patients.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
4.2
作者:
A. Thompson;Kristen L. Estabrooks;S. Chong;R. Stein
通讯作者:
R. Stein
影响因子:
5.5
作者:
NIELSEN, J;PETERSEN, N;BALLEGAARD, M
通讯作者:
BALLEGAARD, M
影响因子:
12.7
作者:
R. Scelsi;S. Lotta;G. Lommi;P. Poggi;C. Marchetti
通讯作者:
C. Marchetti
影响因子:
14.5
作者:
Crone, C;Johnsen, LL;Nielsen, JB
通讯作者:
Nielsen, JB
影响因子:
3
作者:
Okuma, Y;Lee, RG
通讯作者:
Lee, RG