Accuracy of judging time to arrival: effects of modality, trajectory, and gender.
Accuracy of judging time to arrival: effects of modality, trajectory, and gender.
复制标题
判断到达时间的准确性：方式、轨迹和性别的影响。
DOI：
10.1037//0096-1523.16.2.303
复制
发表时间：
1990
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
R. Oldak
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
William Schiff;R. Oldak
在4个实验中检查了观测者使用到达时间（Ta）信息的准确性。问题包括使用视觉与声学Ta信息，使用声学Ta信息的盲人，使用Ta信息控制速度，以及接近角和到达时间对判断精度的影响。视觉信息的使用效率高于视听和听觉信息。盲人使用的声音接近信息准确的Ss使用视觉信息。径向，斜向和横向方向被用来检查的影响，办法轨迹。径向事件被低估，而更准确的横向方法可能被高估。斜角事件产生的中间精度意味着时空各向异性。女人比男人更低估Ta。讨论了学生判断准确性的可能原因，包括线性和非线性光学变化以及与空间技能和经验的关系。
Observers' accuracy in using time-to-arrival (Ta) information was examined in 4 experiments. The issues included use of visual vs. acoustic Ta information, use of acoustic Ta information by blind Ss, use of Ta information controlling for velocity, and effects of angle of approach and arrival time on judgment accuracy. Visual information was used more efficiently than audiovisual and auditory information. Blind Ss used acoustical approach information as accurately as sighted Ss used visual information. Radial, oblique, and transverse orientations were used to examine effects of approach trajectory. Radial events were underestimated, whereas the more accurate transverse approach was likely to be overestimated. Oblique angle events yielded intermediate accuracies implying a spatiotemporal anisotropy. Women underestimated Ta more than did men. Possible reasons for Ss' judgment accuracy, including linear vs. nonlinear optical changes and relation to spatial skills and experience, were discussed.
影响因子：
4.6
作者：
LINN, MC;PETERSEN, AC
通讯作者：
PETERSEN, AC