Effect of housing relocation subsidy policy on energy consumption: A simulation case study

Effect of housing relocation subsidy policy on energy consumption: A simulation case study
复制标题

搬迁补贴政策对能源消耗的影响:模拟案例研究

DOI:
10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.01.068
复制
发表时间:
2016-04
期刊:
影响因子:
11.2
通讯作者:
Shoshi Mizokami
Shoshi Mizokami
中科院分区:
工程技术1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Yanhong Yin;Kohei Aikawa;Shoshi Mizokami

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

本研究通过模拟居民搬迁选择行为和消费行为,探讨了住房搬迁政策对能源消费的影响。能源消耗乃根据消耗行为估计。分析了三种政策类型:搬迁补贴政策、郊区住宅税收政策和补贴与税收相结合的政策。研究结果表明,各种政策对居民的住房拆迁选择和消费行为都有影响。根据搬迁补贴政策,特定地区的家庭数量将增加2%。然而,这类政策导致对一般商品、土地和能源消耗的需求增加。郊区住宅税收政策对住房搬迁选择行为的影响非常有限,仅增加了0.1%的指定地区的家庭。然而,由于出行时间缩短,汽车出行和土地需求减少,该政策显示出强大的节能效果。补贴政策和郊区居住税政策相结合,吸引了2.2%的家庭搬到市中心地区。能源消耗随着一般商品消费的增加而增加。
This study investigates the effect of housing relocation policies on energy consumption by simulating household relocation choice behaviors and consumption behaviors. Energy consumption is estimated based on consumption behaviors. Three types of policy are analyzed: the relocation subsidy policy, the suburban residence taxation policy, and the combination of subsidy and taxation policy. The results show that all policies have influence on housing relocation choice and consumption behaviors. The number of households in a given area would increase by two percent under the relocation subsidy policy. However, this type of policy contributes to greater demand of general goods, land, and more energy consumption. A suburban residence taxation policy shows very limited effect on housing relocation choice behaviors, with only a 0.1% increase of households in the designated area. However, this policy shows strong effect on energy reduction due to shorter trip time and less demand of car trips and land. A combination of subsidy policy and suburban residence taxation policy attracts 2.2% of households move to the city center area. Energy consumption increases as consumption of general goods increases.
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.12.049
发表时间: 2011-06
期刊: Applied Energy
影响因子: 11.2
作者:
J. Kragh;J. Rose
通讯作者: J. Kragh;J. Rose
DOI: 10.1080/07474938.2014.975634
发表时间: 2016-02
影响因子: 1.2
作者:
Florian Heiss
通讯作者: Florian Heiss
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.12.033
发表时间: 2009-10
期刊: Applied Energy
影响因子: 11.2
作者:
A. Chel;G. Tiwari
通讯作者: A. Chel;G. Tiwari
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.01.061
发表时间: 2013-12
期刊: Applied Energy
影响因子: 11.2
作者:
Y. Yamagata;H. Seya
通讯作者: Y. Yamagata;H. Seya
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.11.018
发表时间: 2014-03
期刊: Applied Energy
影响因子: 11.2
作者:
C. Hachem;A. Athienitis;P. Fazio
通讯作者: C. Hachem;A. Athienitis;P. Fazio