Yoga Program for Type 2 Diabetes Prevention (YOGA-DP) Among High-Risk People: Qualitative Study to Explore Reasons for Non-participation in a Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial in India.

Yoga Program for Type 2 Diabetes Prevention (YOGA-DP) Among High-Risk People: Qualitative Study to Explore Reasons for Non-participation in a Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial in India.
复制标题

DOI:
10.3389/fpubh.2021.682203
复制
发表时间:
2021
影响因子:
5.2
通讯作者:
Chattopadhyay K
Chattopadhyay K
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Mishra P;Greenfield SM;Harris T;Hamer M;Lewis SA;Singh K;Nair R;Mukherjee S;Krishnamurthy Manjunath N;Harper DR;Tandon N;Kinra S;Prabhakaran D;Chattopadhyay K

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

背景:以瑜伽为基础的干预措施可以有效预防2型糖尿病(T2 DM)。我们在高危人群中开发了一项瑜伽预防T2 DM计划(YOGA-DP),并在印度进行了可行性随机对照试验(RCT)。本研究的目的是确定和探索潜在参与者拒绝参加可行性RCT的原因。方法:在印度新德里的一家瑜伽中心进行了一项探索性定性研究,采用半结构化访谈。对14名拒绝参加可行性RCT的人(10名女性和4名男性)进行了采访,其中13人完成了非参与者问卷,其中包括他们的社会人口统计学,饮食,体育活动以及下降的原因。结果如下:确定并探讨了阻止参与可行性RCT的三种类型的障碍:(1)个人障碍,如缺乏时间、认为知识足够、对自我管理健康的偏好以及对其他传统和替代疗法的信任;(2)背景障碍,如社会影响和缺乏对预防保健的认识;(3)与研究相关的障碍,如缺乏研究信息、瑜伽网站的可访问性差、对研究方法和干预措施缺乏信任。结论:我们确定并探讨了参与印度可行性RCT的个人、背景和研究相关障碍。这些发现将有助于解决未来瑜伽和其他RCT的招募挑战。临床试验注册:www.ClinicalTrials.gov,标识符:CTRI/2019/05/018893。
Background: Yoga-based interventions can be effective in preventing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We developed a Yoga program for T2DM prevention (YOGA-DP) among high-risk people and conducted a feasibility randomized controlled trial (RCT) in India. The objective of this study was to identify and explore why potential participants declined to participate in the feasibility RCT. Methods: An exploratory qualitative study, using semi-structured interviews, was conducted at a Yoga center in New Delhi, India. Fourteen people (10 women and four men) who declined to participate in the feasibility RCT were interviewed, and 13 of them completed the non-participant questionnaire, which captured their socio-demographics, diets, physical activities, and reasons for declining. Results: Three types of barriers were identified and explored which prevented participation in the feasibility RCT: (1) personal barriers, such as lack of time, perceived sufficiency of knowledge, preferences about self-management of health, and trust in other traditional and alternative therapies; (2) contextual barriers, such as social influences and lack of awareness about preventive care; and (3) study-related barriers, such as lack of study information, poor accessibility to the Yoga site, and lack of trust in the study methods and intervention. Conclusions: We identified and explored personal, contextual, and study-related barriers to participation in a feasibility RCT in India. The findings will help to address recruitment challenges in future Yoga and other RCTs. Clinical Trial Registration:www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: CTRI/2019/05/018893.
DOI: 10.1038/s41430-018-0094-1
发表时间: 2018-04-01
影响因子: 4.7
作者:
Minocha, Sumedha;Thomas, Tinku;Kurpad, Anura V.
通讯作者: Kurpad, Anura V.
制定和评估复杂的干预措施:新的医学研究委员会指南。
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.a1655
发表时间: 2008-09-29
期刊: BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
影响因子: --
作者:
Craig P;Dieppe P;Macintyre S;Michie S;Nazareth I;Petticrew M;Medical Research Council Guidance
通讯作者: Medical Research Council Guidance
DOI: 10.1111/jdi.12548
发表时间: 2017-03
影响因子: 3.2
作者:
Cui J;Yan JH;Yan LM;Pan L;Le JJ;Guo YZ
通讯作者: Guo YZ
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-2615-3
发表时间: 2015-12-26
期刊: BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
影响因子: 4.5
作者:
Mendenhall, Emily;Norris, Shane A.
通讯作者: Norris, Shane A.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225431
发表时间: 2019-11-25
期刊: PLOS ONE
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Muhwava, Lorrein Shamiso;Murphy, Katherine;Levitt, Naomi
通讯作者: Levitt, Naomi