Generation of priority research questions to inform conservation policy and management at a national level.
Generation of priority research questions to inform conservation policy and management at a national level.
复制标题
生成优先研究问题，以告知国家一级的保护政策和管理。
DOI：
10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01625.x
复制
发表时间：
2011-06
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Veilleux JP
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Rudd MA;Beazley KF;Cooke SJ;Fleishman E;Lane DE;Mascia MB;Roth R;Tabor G;Bakker JA;Bellefontaine T;Berteaux D;Cantin B;Chaulk KG;Cunningham K;Dobell R;Fast E;Ferrara N;Findlay CS;Hallstrom LK;Hammond T;Hermanutz L;Hutchings JA;Lindsay KE;Marta TJ;Nguyen VM;Northey G;Prior K;Ramirez-Sanchez S;Rice J;Sleep DJ;Szabo ND;Trottier G;Toussaint JP;Veilleux JP
整合自然科学和社会科学的知识对于有效地解决人类利用生物多样性和保护生物多样性之间的社会权衡是必要的。协作过程可以改变决策者对科学证据的思考方式，提高相互信任和可信度，并推进保护政策话语。加拿大负责一些主要生态系统的很大一部分，如北方森林、北极苔原、湿地、温带和北极海洋。这些生态系统内生物多样性的压力源来自国家的资源型经济活动，以及环境变化的外部驱动因素。生态和政治边界之间的不一致以及对社会和经济目标的冲突观点使有效管理变得复杂。通过有针对性的、及时的研究，许多关于压力源及其管理的知识差距可能会缩小。我们确定了40个问题，如果这些问题得到解决或回答，将推进研究，这些研究极有可能支持制定针对加拿大物种、生态系统和生态过程的有效政策和管理策略。共有396个候选问题来自自然科学和社会科学学科，由来自不同组织的个人提供。这些都是由我们的合作者团队共同挑选出来的。这些问题强调了解生态系统、气候变化的影响和减缓、协调跨多个司法管辖区的治理和管理工作，以及审查保护政策与土著人民的社会和经济福利之间的关系。我们确定的问题提供了保护科学证据与保护和资源管理政策制定之间的潜在联系。我们在科学家和决策者之间进行沟通和参与的合作过程，在国家层面上产生和优先考虑研究问题，可以成为加拿大以外类似努力的典范。Generación de Preguntas de Investigación para inforinforma优先事项和las Políticas y Gestión de la Conservación a Nivel Nacional
Integrating knowledge from across the natural and social sciences is necessary to effectively address societal tradeoffs between human use of biological diversity and its preservation. Collaborative processes can change the ways decision makers think about scientific evidence, enhance levels of mutual trust and credibility, and advance the conservation policy discourse. Canada has responsibility for a large fraction of some major ecosystems, such as boreal forests, Arctic tundra, wetlands, and temperate and Arctic oceans. Stressors to biological diversity within these ecosystems arise from activities of the country's resource-based economy, as well as external drivers of environmental change. Effective management is complicated by incongruence between ecological and political boundaries and conflicting perspectives on social and economic goals. Many knowledge gaps about stressors and their management might be reduced through targeted, timely research. We identify 40 questions that, if addressed or answered, would advance research that has a high probability of supporting development of effective policies and management strategies for species, ecosystems, and ecological processes in Canada. A total of 396 candidate questions drawn from natural and social science disciplines were contributed by individuals with diverse organizational affiliations. These were collaboratively winnowed to 40 by our team of collaborators. The questions emphasize understanding ecosystems, the effects and mitigation of climate change, coordinating governance and management efforts across multiple jurisdictions, and examining relations between conservation policy and the social and economic well-being of Aboriginal peoples. The questions we identified provide potential links between evidence from the conservation sciences and formulation of policies for conservation and resource management. Our collaborative process of communication and engagement between scientists and decision makers for generating and prioritizing research questions at a national level could be a model for similar efforts beyond Canada. Generación de Preguntas de Investigación Prioritarias para Informar a las Políticas y Gestión de la Conservación a Nivel Nacional
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
7
作者：
Rudd, MA
通讯作者：
Rudd, MA
影响因子：
3.1
作者：
Rudd, Murray A.
通讯作者：
Rudd, Murray A.
影响因子：
7
作者：
Ingraham, Molly W.;Foster, Shonda Gilliland
通讯作者：
Foster, Shonda Gilliland
影响因子：
1.5
作者：
Morton, S. R.;Hoegh-Guldberg, O.;Woinarski, J. C. Z.
通讯作者：
Woinarski, J. C. Z.
影响因子：
6.5
作者：
Prowse, Terry D.;Furgal, Chris
通讯作者：
Furgal, Chris