Outside the Clinic Door: How Neighborhood Sociodemographic Disadvantage is Associated with Community Therapist Secondary Traumatic Stress and Emotional Exhaustion.
Outside the Clinic Door: How Neighborhood Sociodemographic Disadvantage is Associated with Community Therapist Secondary Traumatic Stress and Emotional Exhaustion.
复制标题
诊所门外:社区社会人口劣势如何与社区治疗师的二次创伤性压力和情绪疲惫相关。
DOI:
10.1080/23794925.2024.2310512
复制
发表时间:
2024
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Brookman-Frazee,Lauren
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kuckertz,Mary;Lind,Teresa;Lau,AnnaS;Motamedi,Mojdeh;Wright,Blanche;Le,Kenny;Brookman-Frazee,Lauren
Therapists serving families with high rates of trauma exposure in community mental health clinics face the potential risk of experiencing secondary traumatic stress and emotional exhaustion, both of which pose barriers for the implementation and sustainment of evidence-based practices. Previous research documents negative effects of living in socioeconomic disadvantaged neighborhoods on child development but has not examined the effects of working in these neighborhoods on therapist well-being. The current study merges publicly available data, administrative claims data on mental health services, and therapy survey data to 1) identify associations between neighborhood sociodemographic disadvantage and two community therapist well-being constructs, specifically secondary traumatic stress and emotional exhaustion; and 2) examine potential clinic- and therapist-level explanatory factors in the associations between neighborhood sociodemographic disadvantage and therapist well-being. A cumulative risk index approach was applied to calculate neighborhood sociodemographic disadvantage. Greater neighborhood sociodemographic disadvantage was significantly associated with higher levels of therapist secondary traumatic stress (B= .09,p< .05) but not emotional exhaustion. Because therapists in higher risk neighborhoods face higher secondary traumatic stress levels, additional research is needed to better understand how these therapists can be best supported, thus supporting families receiving treatment and implementation of evidence-based practices.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
2.8
作者:
M. L. Pulido
通讯作者:
M. L. Pulido
影响因子:
25.8
作者:
Lewis, Gemma;Dykxhoorn, Jennifer;Kirkbride, James B.
通讯作者:
Kirkbride, James B.
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2017
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
Michael T. Baglivio;Kevin T. Wolff;Nathan Epps;Randy B. Nelson
通讯作者:
Randy B. Nelson
影响因子:
1.6
作者:
Erik Tullberg;G. Boothe
通讯作者:
G. Boothe
影响因子:
2.4
作者:
G. Ryan;Charlie Duncan;N. Moller
通讯作者:
N. Moller