Health specific traits beyond the Five Factor Model, cognitive processes and trait expression: replies to Watson (2012), Matthews (2012) and Haslam, Jetten, Reynolds, and Reicher (2012).

Health specific traits beyond the Five Factor Model, cognitive processes and trait expression: replies to Watson (2012), Matthews (2012) and Haslam, Jetten, Reynolds, and Reicher (2012).
复制标题

DOI:
10.1080/17437199.2012.701061
复制
发表时间:
2013-05
影响因子:
9.8
通讯作者:
Lawrence C
Lawrence C
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ferguson E;Ward JW;Skatova A;Cassaday HJ;Bibby PA;Lawrence C

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

在这篇文章中,我们对弗格森(2012)文章的三篇评论所提出的问题进行了回应。沃森认为,健康焦虑、述情障碍、同理心和D型这四种特征并不在五因素模型(FFM)之外。因子分析数据表明,健康焦虑是正、负情感的独立因子,述情障碍是FFM外的独立因子,情感共情是亲和性的,认知共情是FFM外的独立因子。在这些分析中,没有证据表明存在人格的一般因素。我们还表明,健康焦虑、共情方面和述情障碍的效度高于FFM特征。然而,D型存在于FFM之外的证据不太清楚。认为性格特征对认知的影响更为分散,而注意力不属于弗格森理论框架的一部分。我们同意;但弗格森最初的说法关注的是特质在哪里产生最大的影响。最后,Haslam等人建议应该从动态互动的角度来看待特质。事实上,这就是我们要强调的特质也会影响群体过程。
In this article we reply to the issues raised by the three commentaries on Ferguson's (2012) article. Watson argues that the four traits identified by – health anxiety, alexithymia, empathy and Type D – do not lie outside the Five Factor Model (FFM). We present factor analytic data showing that health anxiety forms a separate factor from positive and negative affectivity, alexithymia forms a factor outside the FFM and while emotional empathy loads with agreeableness, cognitive empathy forms a separate factor outside the FFM. Across these analyses there was no evidence for a general factor of personality. We also show that health anxiety, empathic facets and alexithymia show incremental validity over FFM traits. However, the evidence that Type D lies outside the FFM is less clear. argues that traits have a more distributed influence on cognitions and that attention is not part of Ferguson's framework. We agree; but Ferguson's original statement concerned where traits have their maximal effect. Finally, Haslam et al. suggest that traits should be viewed from a dynamic interactionist perspective. This is in fact what suggested and we go on to highlight that traits can also influence group processes.
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.07.013
发表时间: 2010-02-01
影响因子: 16.8
作者:
Dingemanse, Niels J.;Kazem, Anahita J. N.;Wright, Jonathan
通讯作者: Wright, Jonathan
DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.108.2.346
发表时间: 2001-04-01
影响因子: 5.4
作者:
Dickens, WT;Flynn, JR
通讯作者: Flynn, JR
DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2010.547985
发表时间: 2013-05-01
影响因子: 9.8
作者:
Ferguson, Eamonn
通讯作者: Ferguson, Eamonn
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00568.x
发表时间: 2009-06-01
影响因子: 5
作者:
Ferguson, Eamonn;Bibby, Peter A.;O'Carroll, Ronan
通讯作者: O'Carroll, Ronan
DOI: 10.1080/08870440290025858
发表时间: 2002-10-01
影响因子: 3.3
作者:
De Fruyt, F;Denollet, J
通讯作者: Denollet, J