National priority setting partnership using a Delphi consensus process to develop neonatal research questions suitable for practice-changing randomised trials in the United Kingdom.
National priority setting partnership using a Delphi consensus process to develop neonatal research questions suitable for practice-changing randomised trials in the United Kingdom.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061330
复制
发表时间:
2022-09-28
期刊:
影响因子:
2.9
通讯作者:
Gale, Chris
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Evans, Katie;Battersby, Cheryl;Boardman, James P.;Boyle, Elaine M.;Carroll, William D.;Dinwiddy, Kate;Dorling, Jon;Gallagher, Katie;Hardy, Pollyanna;Johnston, Emma;Mactier, Helen;Marcroft, Claire;Webbe, James;Gale, Chris
Methodologically robust clinical trials are required to improve neonatal care and reduce unwanted variations in practice. Previous neonatal research prioritisation processes have identified important research themes rather than specific research questions amenable to clinical trials. Practice-changing trials require well-defined research questions, commonly organised using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO) structure. By narrowing the scope of research priorities to those which can be answered in clinical trials and by involving a wide range of different stakeholders, we aim to provide a robust and transparent process to identify and prioritise research questions answerable within the National Healthcare System to inform future practice-changing clinical trials. A steering group comprising parents, doctors, nurses, allied health professionals, researchers and representatives from key organisations (Neonatal Society, British Association of Perinatal Medicine, Neonatal Nurses Association and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health) was identified to oversee this project. We will invite submissions of research questions formatted using the PICO structure from the following stakeholder groups using an online questionnaire: parents, patients, healthcare professionals and academic researchers. Unanswered, non-duplicate research questions will be entered into a three-round eDelphi survey of all stakeholder groups. Research questions will be ranked by mean aggregate scores. The final list of prioritised research questions will be disseminated through traditional academic channels, directly to key stakeholder groups through representative organisations and on social media. The outcome of the project will be shared with key research organisations such as the National Institute for Health Research. Research ethics committee approval is not required.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1056/nejmoa2022926
发表时间:
2020-11-19
期刊:
The New England journal of medicine
影响因子:
--
作者:
RECOVERY Collaborative Group;Horby P;Mafham M;Linsell L;Bell JL;Staplin N;Emberson JR;Wiselka M;Ustianowski A;Elmahi E;Prudon B;Whitehouse T;Felton T;Williams J;Faccenda J;Underwood J;Baillie JK;Chappell LC;Faust SN;Jaki T;Jeffery K;Lim WS;Montgomery A;Rowan K;Tarning J;Watson JA;White NJ;Juszczak E;Haynes R;Landray MJ
通讯作者:
Landray MJ
影响因子:
2.9
作者:
Ho, Alison;Webster, Louise;Chappell, Lucy
通讯作者:
Chappell, Lucy
影响因子:
2.9
作者:
Pierrat, Veronique;Burguet, Antoine;Kaminski, Monique
通讯作者:
Kaminski, Monique
影响因子:
3.6
作者:
Johnson, Mark J.;Lapillonne, Alexandre;Bronsky, Jiri;Domellof, Magnus;Embleton, Nicholas;Iacobelli, Silvia;Jochum, Frank;Joosten, Koen;Kolacek, Sanja;Mihatsch, Walter A.;Moltu, Sissel J.;Puntis, John W. L.;Riskin, Arieh;Shamir, Raanan;Tabbers, Merit M.;Van Goudoever, Johannes B.;Saenz de Pipaon, Miguel
通讯作者:
Saenz de Pipaon, Miguel
DOI:
10.1136/bmj.e7961
发表时间:
2012-12-04
期刊:
BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
影响因子:
--
作者:
Moore T;Hennessy EM;Myles J;Johnson SJ;Draper ES;Costeloe KL;Marlow N
通讯作者:
Marlow N