Regional organisations in the UNGA: who is most active and why?

Regional organisations in the UNGA: who is most active and why?
复制标题

联合国大会中的区域组织:谁最活跃?为什么?

DOI:
10.1057/s41268-017-0119-8
复制
发表时间:
--
影响因子:
1.7
通讯作者:
Anke Wiedemann
Anke Wiedemann
中科院分区:
法学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Diana Panke;Stefan Lang;Anke Wiedemann

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

联合国大会是一个大型的谈判竞技场。虽然许多研究集中在其成员国的行为,不同的区域组织(RO)的作用吸引了很少的比较奖学金。虽然区域组织没有正式的投票权,但它们积极参与联合国大会的谈判,通常是通过其成员国。为了回答为什么一些区域组织(如欧盟,东盟,加共体)在联大谈判中比其他组织(如Au,SCO,CoE,安第斯)更有发言权,我们从理论上分析了能力,机会和意愿组件如何影响区域组织积极参与国际谈判的倾向。我们举例说明,如果区域办事处规模小、装备精良、年龄大、具有与谈判竞技场所涉问题相匹配的政策能力,并且能够很好地正式参与联合国谈判,那么它们在联合国大会上的发言权就会越来越大,而在能力方面得分较低,在某种程度上也在机会和意愿方面得分较低的区域办事处往往在联合国大会谈判中不那么活跃。
The General Assembly of the United Nations (UNGA) is a large negotiation arena. While much research focuses on the behaviour of its member states, the role of different regional organisations (ROs) has attracted little comparative scholarship. Although ROs have no formal votes, they are active in UNGA negotiations, most often through their member states. To answer why some ROs (e.g. EU, ASEAN, CARICOM) are more vocal in UNGA negotiations than others (e.g. AU, SCO, CoE, Andean), we theorise how ability, opportunity and willingness components influence RO dispositions to participate actively in international negotiations. We illustrate that ROs are increasingly vocal in the UNGA if they are small, well-equipped, old, have policy competencies that match the issues covered by the negotiation arena, and have good formal access to UN negotiations, while ROs that score lower on ability and to some extent also on opportunity and willingness components tend to be less active in UNGA negotiations.
平等机构中的不平等行为者
DOI: --
发表时间: 2013
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
D. Panke
通讯作者: D. Panke
DOI: 10.1162/002081800551154
发表时间: 2000-03
影响因子: 7.8
作者:
E. Voeten
通讯作者: E. Voeten
联合国大会——一个空谈家?探讨在随后的谈判中重复决议的理由
DOI: --
发表时间: 2014
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
D. Panke
通讯作者: D. Panke
里斯本条约后联合国的多边领导
DOI: --
发表时间: 2010
期刊: European Foreign Affairs Review
影响因子: --
作者:
K. Laatikainen
通讯作者: K. Laatikainen
DOI: --
发表时间: 1966
期刊: The Journal of Modern African Studies
影响因子: --
作者:
B. D. Meyers
通讯作者: B. D. Meyers