Empirical estimates of regional carbon budgets imply reduced global soil heterotrophic respiration.
Empirical estimates of regional carbon budgets imply reduced global soil heterotrophic respiration.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1093/nsr/nwaa145
复制
发表时间:
2021-03
影响因子:
20.6
通讯作者:
Zhu D
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ciais P;Yao Y;Gasser T;Baccini A;Wang Y;Lauerwald R;Peng S;Bastos A;Li W;Raymond PA;Canadell JG;Peters GP;Andres RJ;Chang J;Yue C;Dolman AJ;Haverd V;Hartmann J;Laruelle G;Konings AG;King AW;Liu Y;Luyssaert S;Maignan F;Patra PK;Peregon A;Regnier P;Pongratz J;Poulter B;Shvidenko A;Valentini R;Wang R;Broquet G;Yin Y;Zscheischler J;Guenet B;Goll DS;Ballantyne AP;Yang H;Qiu C;Zhu D
Resolving regional carbon budgets is critical for informing land-based mitigation policy. For nine regions covering nearly the whole globe, we collected inventory estimates of carbon-stock changes complemented by satellite estimates of biomass changes where inventory data are missing. The net land–atmospheric carbon exchange (NEE) was calculated by taking the sum of the carbon-stock change and lateral carbon fluxes from crop and wood trade, and riverine-carbon export to the ocean. Summing up NEE from all regions, we obtained a global ‘bottom-up’ NEE for net land anthropogenic CO2 uptake of –2.2 ± 0.6 PgC yr−1 consistent with the independent top-down NEE from the global atmospheric carbon budget during 2000–2009. This estimate is so far the most comprehensive global bottom-up carbon budget accounting, which set up an important milestone for global carbon-cycle studies. By decomposing NEE into component fluxes, we found that global soil heterotrophic respiration amounts to a source of CO2 of 39 PgC yr−1 with an interquartile of 33–46 PgC yr−1—a much smaller portion of net primary productivity than previously reported.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
56.9
作者:
Beer, Christian;Reichstein, Markus;Papale, Dario
通讯作者:
Papale, Dario
影响因子:
6.3
作者:
Di Giuseppe, Francesca;Remy, Samuel;Wetterhall, Fredrik
通讯作者:
Wetterhall, Fredrik
影响因子:
6.7
作者:
Cervarich, Matthew;Shu, Shijie;Zeng, Ning
通讯作者:
Zeng, Ning
影响因子:
4.9
作者:
Bond-Lamberty, B.;Thomson, A.
通讯作者:
Thomson, A.
影响因子:
5.1
作者:
Gasser, Thomas;Ciais, Philippe;Hauglustaine, Didier
通讯作者:
Hauglustaine, Didier