Vaccination after prior COVID-19 infection: Implications for dose sparing and booster shots.
Vaccination after prior COVID-19 infection: Implications for dose sparing and booster shots.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103586
复制
发表时间:
2021-10
期刊:
影响因子:
11.1
通讯作者:
Juno JA
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kent SJ;Juno JA
Immunity elicited by both COVID-19 infection and SARS-CoV-2 vaccination effectively primes the immune system and provides protection from future re-infection. Analysis of multiple phase 3 clinical trials has suggested that neutralizing antibody titres are a strong correlate of protection against re-infection [1]. As time passes, neutralizing antibodies wane [2] and reinfections of individuals with prior COVID-19 are increasingly being reported [3]. Re-infections are generally clinically mild with lower levels of virus and reduced transmission. SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, in particular Beta and Delta, are more infectious and evade a substantial proportion of the neutralizing antibody response from prior infection [4]. There is increasing interest in vaccination of subjects with prior COVID-19 to prevent reinfections.In this article, Zollner et al. study antibody and T cell responses in a cohort of 14 subjects with prior mild-moderate COVID-19 who received the BioNTech/Pfizer BNT162b2 (Comirnaty) vaccine compared to 27 uninfected subjects [5]. In concordance with prior studies, a remarkable boost in Spike-specific neutralizing antibodies was observed in vaccinated subjects with prior COVID-19, with levels» 20-fold higher after the first dose and» 6-fold higher after the second dose compared to uninfected controls. Importantly, the added benefit of a 2nd vaccine dose at the standard 3-week interval was modest in previously infected subjects (< 2-fold rise). These data suggest that deferring the second vaccination of individuals with prior infection may be a more cost-effective strategy to re-boost neutralizing antibody titres in some populations. Although it comes with logistic challenges (confirming prior infection), such a vaccine-
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
16.6
作者:
Wheatley AK;Juno JA;Wang JJ;Selva KJ;Reynaldi A;Tan HX;Lee WS;Wragg KM;Kelly HG;Esterbauer R;Davis SK;Kent HE;Mordant FL;Schlub TE;Gordon DL;Khoury DS;Subbarao K;Cromer D;Gordon TP;Chung AW;Davenport MP;Kent SJ
通讯作者:
Kent SJ
DOI:
10.1038/s41577-021-00550-x
发表时间:
2021-06
期刊:
Nature reviews. Immunology
影响因子:
--
作者:
Cromer D;Juno JA;Khoury D;Reynaldi A;Wheatley AK;Kent SJ;Davenport MP
通讯作者:
Davenport MP
影响因子:
82.9
作者:
Juno, Jennifer A.;Tan, Hyon-Xhi;Wheatley, Adam K.
通讯作者:
Wheatley, Adam K.
影响因子:
82.9
作者:
Khoury, David S.;Cromer, Deborah;Davenport, Miles P.
通讯作者:
Davenport, Miles P.
影响因子:
11.1
作者:
Zollner A;Watschinger C;Rössler A;Farcet MR;Penner A;Böhm V;Kiechl SJ;Stampfel G;Hintenberger R;Tilg H;Koch R;Antlanger M;Kreil TR;Kimpel J;Moschen AR
通讯作者:
Moschen AR