Children's Moral Reasoning Regarding Physical and Relational Aggression
Children's Moral Reasoning Regarding Physical and Relational Aggression
复制标题
儿童关于身体和关系攻击的道德推理
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2006
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
K. Galotti
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Dianna Murray;Nicki R. Crick;K. Galotti
本研究探讨了小学生关于身体攻击和关系攻击的道德推理。四年级和五年级的学生认为身体攻击比关系攻击更错误和有害，但对这两种形式的攻击倾向于采取道德取向。在对攻击行为的道德判断上，研究人员观察到了性别差异，女孩认为身体攻击和关系攻击更错误，关系攻击比男孩更有害。此外，女孩在判断肢体攻击和关系攻击时更有可能采取道德取向，并且女孩更多地从道德领域判断关系攻击而不是身体攻击。最后，关于攻击的道德推理与身体和关系上的攻击行为有关。综合考虑，结果表明，儿童倾向于对攻击采取道德取向，但他们在道德判断中仍然区分了身体攻击和关系攻击。
Elementary school children's moral reasoning concerning physical and relational aggression was explored. Fourth and fifth graders rated physical aggression as more wrong and harmful than relational aggression but tended to adopt a moral orientation about both forms of aggression. Gender differences in moral judgments of aggression were observed, with girls rating physical and relational aggression as more wrong and relational aggression as more harmful than boys. In addition, girls were more likely to adopt a moral orientation when judging physical and relational aggression and girls more often judged relational aggression than physical aggression from the moral domain. Finally, moral reasoning about aggression was associated with physically and relationally aggressive behavior. Considered together, the results indicate that children tend to adopt a moral orientation about aggression, but that they nonetheless differentiate between physical and relational aggression in their moral judgments.
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Huesmann, LR;Guerra, NG
通讯作者：
Guerra, NG
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Rudolph, KD
通讯作者：
Rudolph, KD
DOI：
10.1037//0012-1649.33.4.589
发表时间：
1997
期刊：
Developmental psychology.
影响因子：
--
作者：
Galen,BR;Underwood,MK
通讯作者：
Underwood,MK