EGFR signaling augments TLR4 cell surface expression and function in macrophages via regulation of Rab5a activation
EGFR signaling augments TLR4 cell surface expression and function in macrophages via regulation of Rab5a activation
复制标题
EGFR 信号传导通过调节 Rab5a 激活增强巨噬细胞中 TLR4 细胞表面表达和功能
DOI:
10.1007/s13238-019-00668-8
复制
发表时间:
2019-11
期刊:
影响因子:
21.1
通讯作者:
Fan Jie
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Tang Jing;Zhou Bowei;Scott Melanie J.;Chen Linsong;Lai Dengming;Fan Erica K.;Li Yuehua;Wu Qiang;Billiar Timothy R.;Wilson Mark A.;Wang Ping;Fan Jie
Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) is a key receptor sensing bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and is the most investigated member of the Toll-like receptor family (Kawai and Akira, 2007; Kayagaki et al., 2013; Klein et al., 2015). Cell surface TLR4 expression is determined by the balance between receptor trafficking from the Golgi apparatus to the cell membrane, and internalization of the cell surface receptor into endosomal compartments (Saltoh, 2009). In bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDM), we observed LPS-induced EGFR phosphorylation on the surface of BMDM, and this was inhibited by pretreatment with PD168393 or TAPI-1 (Fig. S1). Next, we measured dynamic changes in cell surface TLR4 expression after LPS treatment. At 6, 12, and 24 h after LPS treatment, TLR4 expression on the surface of BMDM was increased∼ 2-,∼ 6-, and∼ 9-fold, respectively, as compared with controls. EGFR inhibitor PD168393, however, inhibited LPS-mediated increases in cell surface expression of TLR4 at all time points (Fig. 1 A and 1 B). These alterations were also confirmed in a mouse macrophage cell line, RAW264. 7 cells (Fig. S2). Then, C57BL/6 mice were injected intraperitoneally (ip) with LPS (10 mg/kg) with or without pretreatment of EGFR inhibitor, erlotinib (100 mg/kg BW, gavage administration) at 30 min prior to LPS. At 24 h after LPS treatment, peritoneal macrophages were collected. LPS induced 5-fold increases in TLR4 expression on the macrophage surface, and erlotinib pretreatment inhibited TLR4 cell surface expression in response to LPS (Fig. 1 C and 1 D). Then, BMDM cells from EGFR−/− mice were treated with LPS for 24 h and LPS treatment failed to induce increased cell surface expression of TLR4 in EGFR−/− BMDM compared with WT BMDM cells (Fig. 1 E and 1 F). Similar findings were shown in vivo (Fig. 1 G and 1 H), where in contrast to WT mice, TLR4 surface expression on peritoneal macrophages from EGFR−/− mice was not increased at 24 h after LPS challenge. These findings indicate that EGFR phosphorylation is essential for LPS-induced upregulation of TLR4 cell surface expression in macrophages. EGFR phosphorylation inhibitor, PD168393, effectively suppressed LPS-induced TLR4 phosphorylation (Fig. 1 I). In addition, LPS-induced TLR4 phosphorylation was dramatically decreased in EGFR−/− BMDM (Fig. 1 J). We mutated TLR4 674 and 688 Tyr phosphorylation site into Ala. Then HEK293 cells were transfected with MD2, CD14, EGFR and TLR4 or TLR4 mutant. LPS treatment could not lead to the phosphorylation of EGFR in TLR4 mutant group (Fig. 1 K and 1 L). We also measured the effect of TLR4 phosphorylation on TLR4 cell membrane expression. 24 h after LPS treatment LPS-induced cell surface expression of TLR4 was markedly decreased in TLR4 mutant-expressing cells compared with cells expressing WT-TLR4 (Fig. 1 M and 1 N). LPS also induced co-localization of TLR4 and EGFR in BMDM at 30min after LPS treatment, and this was suppressed by EGFR phosphorylation inhibitor PD168393 (Fig. 1 O). In addition, this kind of co-localization between TLR4 and EGFR in response to LPS also depended on the phosphorylation of TLR4 (Fig. S3). However, EGFR did not co-immunoprecipitate with TLR4 in control, LPS, or LPS plus PD168393 pretreatment (Fig. 1 P). We further found that LPS significantly increased EGFR, but not TLR4, mRNA and total protein expression at 6, 12 and 24 h, and this was inhibited by PD168393 pretreatment (Fig. S4A–D). A large proportion of TLR4 receptors are stored in subcellular compartments, such as the Golgi apparatus and endosomes (Husebye et al., 2006). Since EGFR …
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
12.4
作者:
T. Kawai;S. Akira
通讯作者:
T. Kawai;S. Akira
影响因子:
2.8
作者:
S. Saitoh
通讯作者:
S. Saitoh
影响因子:
4.8
作者:
Chen, Yen-Jen;Hsieh, Ming-Yu;Leu, Tzeng-Horng
通讯作者:
Leu, Tzeng-Horng
影响因子:
4.5
作者:
Klein, Dionne C. G.;Skjesol, Astrid;Husebye, Harald
通讯作者:
Husebye, Harald
影响因子:
12.4
作者:
Li, Z.;Scott, M. J.;Fan, J.
通讯作者:
Fan, J.