The refractory headache patient--I. Chronic, daily, high intensity headache.
The refractory headache patient--I. Chronic, daily, high intensity headache.
复制标题
顽固性头痛患者——I.
DOI：
10.1016/0005-7967(89)90011-9
复制
发表时间：
1989
影响因子：
4.1
通讯作者：
Dentinger,MP
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Blanchard,EB;Appelbaum,KA;Radnitz,CL;Jaccard,J;Dentinger,MP
介绍了两项关于慢性、日常、高强度头痛(CDHIHA)的研究。在第一组中，将他们对各种自我调节(生物反馈、放松)治疗的反应与年龄、持续时间和HocCommittee诊断匹配的病例对照组进行比较，后者每周有1-2天无头痛(组II)和每周3-5天无头痛(组III)。CDHIHA患者对治疗的反应明显较差(II组和III组合计改善12.7%比49.8%)。在第二项研究中，将扩大样本的CDHIHA患者的心理特征与来自II组和III组的匹配病例对照组进行了比较。CDHIHA患者往往比II组和III组加起来更焦虑、更歇斯底里、更多的非头痛躯体主诉。
Two studies on patients with Chronic, Daily, High Intensity Headache (CDHIHA) are presented. In the first, their response to various self-regulatory (biofeedback, relaxation) treatments was compared to that of case controls matched for age, duration andAd HocCommittee diagnoses who had 1–2 headache-free days per week (Group II) and 3–5 headache-free days per week (Group III). The CDHIHA patients had a significantly poorer response to treatment (12.7 vs 49.8% improvement for Groups II and III combined). In the second study, the psychological profiles of an enlarged sample of CDHIHA patients were compared to matched case controls from Group II and Group III. The CDHIHA patients tended to be more anxious, more hysterical and to have more non-headache somatic complaints than Groups II and III combined.
DOI：
--
发表时间：
1970
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
C. Spielberger;R. Gorsuch;R. Lushene
通讯作者：
C. Spielberger;R. Gorsuch;R. Lushene
DOI：
--
发表时间：
1988
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
E. Blanchard;S. P. Schwarz
通讯作者：
S. P. Schwarz
三种头痛的生物反馈和放松训练：治疗效果及其预测。
影响因子：
5.9
作者：
Blanchard,EB;Andrasik,F;Neff,DF;Arena,JG;Ahles,TA;Jurish,SE;Pallmeyer,TP;Saunders,NL;Teders,SJ;Barron,KD;Rodichok,LD
通讯作者：
Rodichok,LD