Adaptation and assessments of the Chinese version of the ICECAP-A measurement.

Adaptation and assessments of the Chinese version of the ICECAP-A measurement.
复制标题

ICECAP-A测量中文版的适应和评估

DOI:
10.1186/s12955-018-0865-3
复制
发表时间:
2018-03-12
影响因子:
3.6
通讯作者:
Xu J
Xu J
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Tang C;Xiong Y;Wu H;Xu J

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

BackgroundThis study adapts the ICECAP measure for Adults(ICECAP-A)to assess its capacity to measure the quality of life in China for economic evaluation.MethodsQualitative and quantitative methods was used to translate the ICECAP-A measure for wellbeing,established by the University of Birmingham,UK,to the Chinese cultural context.焦点小组讨论解决了中文ICECAP属性的适当性和措辞,并随机选择了1000名18岁以上的成年人进行在线调查。我们进行了心理测量测试,并比较了影响因素ICECAP-A措施与影响EQ-5D-3 L.ResultsMembers的焦点小组讨论一致认为,ICECAP-A措施的五个属性是足够的,以评估在中国的福祉。但是,“安定”和“友谊”这两个词在中国文化背景下被改为“稳定”和“善良”。结果表明,中文版ICECAP-A具有良好的内部一致性,总体Cronbach’s Alpha系数为0.7999。结论ICECAP-A量表可用于中国人群的幸福感测评,但在文化层面上有必要进行修改。它是一种有效的幸福感测量方法,可以补充中国已经使用的EQ-5D。然而,仍需进一步开展工作,以评估《亚太经社会行动纲领》A项措施在公共卫生和社会保健方面的敏感性。
BackgroundThis study adapts the ICECAP measure for Adults (ICECAP-A) to assess its capacity to measure the quality of life in China for economic evaluation.MethodsQualitative and quantitative methods were used to translate the ICECAP-A measure for wellbeing, established by the University of Birmingham, UK, to the Chinese cultural context. A focus group discussion solved the appropriateness and wording of the ICECAP attributes in Chinese; and a randomly selected sample of 1000 adults aged over 18 years were online surveyed. We conducted psychometric tests and compared the factors influencing the ICECAP-A measure with those influencing EQ-5D-3 L.ResultsMembers of the focus group discussion agreed that the five attributes of the ICECAP-A measure are sufficient to evaluate wellbeing in China. However, the terms “being settled” and “friendship” were changed to “stability” and “kindness” for the Chinese cultural context. Our results show that the Chinese version of ICECAP-A has good internal consistency with an overall Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient of 0.7999. The concurrent validity indicates that ICECAP-A is moderately correlated with EQ-5D-3 L (r ≤ 0.52).ConclusionsThe ICECAP-A measure can be adapted to evaluate wellbeing in China, but cultural changes to the wording are necessary. It is a valid measurement of wellbeing and can complement the EQ-5D already used in China. However, further work is still needed to evaluate the sensitivity of the ICECAP-A measure in relation to public health and social care.
DOI: 10.1002/hec.3100
发表时间: 2015-05
期刊: HEALTH ECONOMICS
影响因子: 2.1
作者:
Al-Janabi, Hareth;Flynn, Terry N.;Peters, Tim J.;Bryan, Stirling;Coast, Joanna
通讯作者: Coast, Joanna
DOI: 10.1258/jhsrp.2008.008024
发表时间: 2008-10-01
影响因子: 2.4
作者:
Coast, Joanna;Flynn, Terry;Peters, Tim
通讯作者: Peters, Tim
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6296(96)00506-1
发表时间: 1997-02-01
影响因子: 3.5
作者:
Garber, AM;Phelps, CE
通讯作者: Phelps, CE
EQ-5D 健康状态的中国时间权衡值
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.05.007
发表时间: 2014-07-01
期刊: VALUE IN HEALTH
影响因子: 4.5
作者:
Liu, Gordon G.;Wu, Hongyan;Luo, Nan
通讯作者: Luo, Nan
DOI: 10.1017/s000305541500026x
发表时间: 2015-08-01
影响因子: 6.8
作者:
Huang, Haifeng
通讯作者: Huang, Haifeng