The implementation of random survival forests in conflict management data: An examination of power sharing and third party mediation in post-conflict countries.
The implementation of random survival forests in conflict management data: An examination of power sharing and third party mediation in post-conflict countries.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0250963
复制
发表时间:
2021
期刊:
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
Cann D
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Whetten AB;Stevens JR;Cann D
Time-to-event analysis is a common occurrence in political science. In recent years, there has been an increased usage of machine learning methods in quantitative political science research. This article advocates for the implementation of machine learning duration models to assist in a sound model selection process. We provide a brief tutorial introduction to the random survival forest (RSF) algorithm and contrast it to a popular predecessor, the Cox proportional hazards model, with emphasis on methodological utility for political science researchers. We implement both methods for simulated time-to-event data and the Power-Sharing Event Dataset (PSED) to assist researchers in evaluating the merits of machine learning duration models. We provide evidence of significantly higher survival probabilities for peace agreements with 3rd party mediated design and implementation. We also detect increased survival probabilities for peace agreements that incorporate territorial power-sharing and avoid multiple rebel party signatories. Further, the RSF, a previously under-used method for analyzing political science time-to event data, provides a novel approach for ranking of peace agreement criteria importance in predicting peace agreement duration. Our findings demonstrate a scenario exhibiting the interpretability and performance of RSF for political science time-to-event data. These findings justify the robust interpretability and competitive performance of the random survival forest algorithm in numerous circumstances, in addition to promoting a diverse, holistic model-selection process for time-to-event political science data.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1198/016214506000000438
发表时间:
2006-09-01
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Fan, Juanjuan;Su, Xiao-Gang;LeBlanc, Michael
通讯作者:
LeBlanc, Michael
影响因子:
4
作者:
Chen HC;Kodell RL;Cheng KF;Chen JJ
通讯作者:
Chen JJ
影响因子:
2.2
作者:
Gregorutti, Baptiste;Michel, Bertrand;Saint-Pierre, Philippe
通讯作者:
Saint-Pierre, Philippe
影响因子:
5.8
作者:
Calhoun, Peter;Su, Xiaogang;Fan, Juanjuan
通讯作者:
Fan, Juanjuan
影响因子:
3.6
作者:
Schrodt, Philip A.
通讯作者:
Schrodt, Philip A.