Awareness, use and understanding of nutrition labels among adults from five countries: Findings from the 2018-2020 International Food Policy Study.
Awareness, use and understanding of nutrition labels among adults from five countries: Findings from the 2018-2020 International Food Policy Study.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.appet.2022.106311
复制
发表时间：
2023-01-01
期刊：
影响因子：
5.4
通讯作者：
Hammond, David
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Acton, Rachel B.;Rynard, Vicki L.;Adams, Jean;Bhawra, Jasmin;Cameron, Adrian J.;Contreras-Manzano, Alejandra;Davis, Rachel E.;Jauregui, Alejandra;Sacks, Gary;Thrasher, James F.;Vanderlee, Lana;White, Christine M.;Hammond, David
很少有研究比较了不同的包装前标签（FOPL）系统在“真实的世界”的影响。这项研究评估了五个国家的成年人对营养成分标签（NFL）和国家实施的FOPL（如健康星星评级（HSR），交通灯和每日指南量（GDA））的认识，使用和理解，包括在2020年实施墨西哥警告FOPL之前和之后。数据来自国际食品政策研究，这是一项于2018-2020年在澳大利亚，加拿大，墨西哥，英国和美国的成年人（N= 64，032）中进行的年度重复横断面研究。随着时间的推移，国家之间以及NFL和FOPL之间，对NFL（所有五个国家）和FOPL（澳大利亚，墨西哥和英国）的自我报告的认识，使用和理解进行了评估。所有国家的大多数受访者都报告说，（意识）在所有三年中“经常”或“一直”，三分之一至一半的受访者“经常”或“一直”使用NFLs（澳大利亚：43-45%;加拿大：47-50%;墨西哥：36-39%;英国：32-34%;美国：大约二分之一到三分之二的人认为NFLs“容易”或“非常容易理解”（56-57%; 67-69%; 51-54%; 48-51%; 70-71%）。2020年，墨西哥对警告FOPL的认识、使用和自我报告的理解在所有FOPL国家中最高（p<0.001），而澳大利亚对HSR的认识和使用最低（p<0.001）。在有FOPL的国家，自我报告的FOPL理解高于NFL，墨西哥的GDA FOPL除外。随着时间的推移，仅观察到适度的变化。与NFLs和基于GDA的FOPLs相比，警告FOPLs与成年人自我报告的意识，使用和理解水平更高相关。在自愿基础上实施的FOPL，如澳大利亚的HSR，可能不太可能被看到和使用。
Few studies have compared the effects of different front-of-package label (FOPL) systems in the ‘real world’. This study assessed adults’ awareness, use and understanding of nutrition facts labels (NFLs) and nationally implemented FOPLs such as Health Star Ratings (HSR), Traffic lights, and Guideline Daily Amounts (GDAs) in five countries, including before and after implementation of Mexico’s warning FOPLs in 2020. Data were from the International Food Policy Study, an annual repeat cross-sectional study conducted in 2018-2020 among adults (N=64,032) in Australia, Canada, Mexico, the UK and the US. Self-reported awareness, use, and understanding of NFLs (in all five countries) and FOPLs (in Australia, Mexico, and UK) were assessed over time, between countries, and between NFLs and FOPLs. Most respondents in all countries reported seeing their country’s NFLs (awareness) ‘often’ or ‘all the time’ across all three years, with one third to half of respondentsusingNFLs ‘often’ or ‘all the time’ (Australia: 43-45%; Canada: 47-50%; Mexico: 36-39%; UK: 32-34%; US: 47-49%), and approximately one half to two thirds finding NFLs ‘easy’ or ‘very easy to understand’ (56-57%; 67-69%; 51-54%; 48-51%; 70-71%). In 2020, awareness, use and self-reported understanding of the Warning FOPLs in Mexico were highest among all countries with a FOPL (p<0.001), whereas awareness and use were lowest for Australia’s HSR (p<0.001). In countries with FOPLs, self-reported understanding was higher for FOPLs than NFLs, except for the GDA FOPL in Mexico. Only modest changes were observed over time. Warning FOPLs were associated with greater levels of self-reported awareness, use and understanding among adults compared to NFLs and GDA-based FOPLs. FOPLs implemented on a voluntary basis, such as Australia’s HSR, may be less likely to be seen and used.
登录
查看更多内容
包装前营养标签对六个国家青年糖饮料健康的疗效的实验研究。
影响因子：
2.8
作者：
Hock K;Acton RB;Jáuregui A;Vanderlee L;White CM;Hammond D
通讯作者：
Hammond D
DOI：
10.1186/s12966-019-0799-0
发表时间：
2019-05-21
影响因子：
8.7
作者：
Acton, Rachel B.;Jones, Amanda C.;Hammond, David
通讯作者：
Hammond, David
影响因子：
3.2
作者：
Ares, Gaston;Antunez, Lucia;Bove, Isabel
通讯作者：
Bove, Isabel
DOI：
10.1186/s12966-017-0482-2
发表时间：
2017-03-07
期刊：
The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity
影响因子：
--
作者：
De la Cruz-Góngora V;Torres P;Contreras-Manzano A;Jáuregui de la Mota A;Mundo-Rosas V;Villalpando S;Rodríguez-Oliveros G
通讯作者：
Rodríguez-Oliveros G
影响因子：
4.2
作者：
Acton, Rachel B.;Vanderlee, Lana;Hammond, Davi
通讯作者：
Hammond, Davi