Efficacy of methylphenidate, psychosocial treatments and their combination in school-aged children with ADHD: a meta-analysis.
Efficacy of methylphenidate, psychosocial treatments and their combination in school-aged children with ADHD: a meta-analysis.
复制标题
哌醋甲酯、心理社会治疗及其组合对学龄多动症儿童的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
DOI:
10.1016/j.cpr.2007.10.007
复制
发表时间:
2008
影响因子:
12.8
通讯作者:
P. Emmelkamp
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
S. Oord;P. Prins;J. Oosterlaan;P. Emmelkamp
INTRODUCTIONThis meta-analysis compares effect-sizes of methylphenidate and psychosocial treatments and their combination on ADHD, concurrent oppositional, conduct symptoms, social behaviors and academic functioning.METHODSeveral databases (PubMed, PsycInfo, ISI Web of Science) were searched for articles published between 1985 and September 2006. Inclusion criteria were: a diagnosis of ADHD; age from 6–12 years; a randomized controlled treatment design; efficacy established with parent and teacher rating scales; psychosocial treatments used were described as behavioral or cognitive-behavioral; the methylphenidate treatment was short-acting; and finally, treatment was conducted in a clinical setting.RESULTSADHD outcomes showed large mean weighted effect-sizes for both methylphenidate and combined treatments, psychosocial treatments had a moderate mean weighted effect-size; a similar pattern emerged for oppositional and conducted behavior symptoms. Social behavior outcomes showed comparable moderate mean weighted effect-sizes for all treatments, while on academic functioning, all treatments had low mean weighted effect-sizes. There was no correlation between duration of psychosocial treatment and effect-size.CONCLUSIONSBoth methylphenidate and psychosocial treatments are effective in reducing ADHD symptoms. However, psychosocial treatment yields smaller effects than both other treatment conditions. Psychosocial treatment has no additional value to methylphenidate for the reduction of ADHD and teacher rated ODD symptoms. However, for social behavior and parent rated ODD the three treatments were equally effective. For improvement of academic functioning no treatment was effective.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
8
作者:
Singer,HS;Brown,J;Quaskey,S;Rosenberg,LA;Mellits,ED;Denckla,MB
通讯作者:
Denckla,MB
影响因子:
4.1
作者:
Waschbusch,DA;Kipp,HL;PelhamJr,WE
通讯作者:
PelhamJr,WE
DOI:
10.1097/01.chi.0000128796.84202.eb
发表时间:
2004-07-01
影响因子:
13.3
作者:
Hechtman, L;Abikoff, H;Pollack, S
通讯作者:
Pollack, S
影响因子:
5.9
作者:
PELHAM, WE;CARLSON, C;HOZA, B
通讯作者:
HOZA, B
DOI:
10.1097/00004583-200102000-00011
发表时间:
2001-02-01
影响因子:
13.3
作者:
Swanson, JM;Kraemer, HC;Wu, M
通讯作者:
Wu, M