Mapping health literacy research in the European Union: a bibliometric analysis.
Mapping health literacy research in the European Union: a bibliometric analysis.
复制标题
在欧盟中绘制健康素养研究：文献分析。
DOI：
10.1371/journal.pone.0002519
复制
发表时间：
2008-06-25
期刊：
影响因子：
3.7
通讯作者：
Falagas, Matthew E.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kondilis, Barbara K.;Kiriaze, Ismene J.;Athanasoulia, Anastasia P.;Falagas, Matthew E.
为了检查和比较当前欧盟成员国、四个等待加入欧盟的候选国、挪威、瑞士和美国在与健康素养相关的选定领域的研究生产力。文献计量分析（1991-2005）。数据来源包括各国作者分别发表的论文。与美国相比，25个欧洲国家的健康素养研究少于1/3（主要隶属于欧盟、4个候选国家和美国的作者分别发表了13,710篇和49,523篇文章）。荷兰和瑞典（其次是德国、意大利和法国）是在卫生知识普及相关领域发表研究报告数量最多的欧洲国家。经过人口调整后，瑞典、芬兰和挪威在相关名单上名列前茅。此外，瑞典、芬兰、爱尔兰在调整国内生产总值（GDP）后，在选定领域的研究效率排名中名列前茅。在欧洲、挪威、瑞士和美国之间，发表的关于健康素养主题的研究存在不平等。在欧洲，可能需要对健康素养的所有领域进行更多的研究，并应进一步调查这种差距的潜在有害影响。
To examine and compare the research productivity on selected fields related to health literacy of the current members of the European Union, the four candidate countries waiting to join the EU, Norway, Switzerland, and the United States. A bibliometric analysis (1991–2005). Data sources included papers published by authors from each country separately. The 25 European countries produce less than 1/3 health literacy research when compared to the U.S. (13,710 and 49,523 articles were published by authors with main affiliation in the European Union and the four candidate countries, and the U.S., respectively). The Netherlands and Sweden (followed by Germany, Italy, and France) are the European countries with the highest number of research published in fields related to health literacy. After adjustment for population Sweden, Finland, and Norway, were on the top of the relevant list. In addition, Sweden, Finland, and Ireland, were on the top of the list of countries regarding research productivity on the selected fields after adjustment for gross domestic product (GDP). Inequalities in research published on the topic of health literacy exist among Europe, Norway, Switzerland, and the U.S. More research may need to be done in all areas of health literacy in Europe and the potential detrimental effects of this gap should be further investigated.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.3
作者：
Mika, VS;Kelly, PJ;Villarreal, R
通讯作者：
Villarreal, R
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Falagas ME;Papastamataki PA;Bliziotis IA
通讯作者：
Bliziotis IA
影响因子：
4.2
作者：
Coey, L
通讯作者：
Coey, L
影响因子：
2.7
作者：
Kickbusch, IS
通讯作者：
Kickbusch, IS
DOI：
10.1367/a04-093r.1
发表时间：
2005-01-01
期刊：
AMBULATORY PEDIATRICS
影响因子：
--
作者：
Leyva, M;Sharif, I;Ozuah, PO
通讯作者：
Ozuah, PO