Uplift at lithospheric swells—I: seismic and gravity constraints on the crust and uppermost mantle structure of the Cape Verde mid‐plate swell
Uplift at lithospheric swells—I: seismic and gravity constraints on the crust and uppermost mantle structure of the Cape Verde mid‐plate swell
复制标题
岩石圈隆起处的隆升:地震和重力对佛得角板中隆起的地壳和上地幔结构的约束
DOI:
10.1111/j.1365-246x.2010.04641.x
复制
发表时间:
2010
影响因子:
2.8
通讯作者:
A. Krabbenhoeft
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Wilson;C. Peirce;A.B. Watts;I. Grevemeyer;A. Krabbenhoeft
Wide-angle seismic data have been used to determine the velocity and density structure of the crust and uppermost mantle beneath the Cape Verdes mid-plate swell. Seismic modelling reveals a ‘standard’ oceanic crust, ∼8 km in thickness, with no direct evidence for low-density bodies at the base of the crust. Gravity anomaly modelling within the constraints and resolution provided by the seismic model, does not preclude, however, a layer of crustal underplate up to 3 km thick beneath the swell crest. The modelling shows that while the seismically constrained crustal structure accounts for the short-wavelength free-air gravity anomaly, it fails to fully explain the long-wavelength anomaly. The main discrepancy is over the swell crest where the gravity anomaly, after correcting for crustal structure, is higher by about 30 mGal than it is over its flanks. The higher gravity can be explained if the top 100 km of the mantle beneath the swell crest is less dense than its surroundings by 30 kg m−3. The lack of evidence for low densities and velocities in the uppermost mantle, and high densities and velocities in the lower crust, suggests that neither a depleted swell root or crustal underplate are the origin of the observed shallower-than-predicted bathymetry and that, instead, the swell is most likely supported by dynamic uplift associated with an anomalously low density asthenospheric mantle.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
2.8
作者:
R. White;R. Detrick;M. Sinha;M. Cormier
通讯作者:
R. White;R. Detrick;M. Sinha;M. Cormier
影响因子:
3.9
作者:
P. Holm;J. Wilson;B. Christensen;L. Hansen;S. L. Hansen;K. M. Hein;A. Mortensen;R. Pedersen;S. Plesner;M. Runge
通讯作者:
M. Runge
影响因子:
5.3
作者:
DAVIS, EE;LISTER, CRB
通讯作者:
LISTER, CRB
DOI:
--
发表时间:
1976
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
B. Dash;M. Ball;G. King;L. W. Butler;P. Rona
通讯作者:
P. Rona
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Masson;T.P LeBas;I. Grevemeyer;W. Weinrebe
通讯作者:
W. Weinrebe